the wealth grows faster than the amount of tax applied (since it is a fixed portion of the ending wealth).
now if return increased as well -> the ending wealth is much higher, (you should be able to do similar calculations as above) but the tax applied is a much smaller proportion of the ending wealth.
CP
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, April 7, 2011 at 06:17AM by cpk123.作者: bodhisattva 时间: 2011-7-11 15:25
Thanks, I totally forget how to calculate tax drag.
The above will look much neater on paper, so no worry.
Here is a trick I got today: no need to memorize anything, as long as we know TD%.
1). as Investment horizon increases => Tax drag increases?
-- set N=large number, then
TD_w ?? 1-(1-tw)^N ==> TD_w increases as N increases.
2). as Investment return increases => Tax drag decreases?
-- set N=1, then
TD_w = tw+tw/R ==> TD_w decreases as R increases.
I tried the partial derivative approach, it's just not worth it.作者: liangfeng 时间: 2011-7-11 15:25
It's "TD_w roughly equals to 1-(1-tw)^N"作者: Analti_Calte 时间: 2011-7-11 15:25
You guys have a trick for remembering the relationship between tax drag and horizon/return among the different types of taxes? without having to do the calcs. I realize that it is due to principal being/not being taxed...