anyone have any insight into this?
it doesn't come up often in schweser Qbank. i guess i was just wondering if you knew of a summary about it?作者: ajpheif16 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
I had a friend last year say they threw in a lever/unlever question at the end of corp finance in the afternoon section...作者: Maddin 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
Do the question 5 times and you will see how simple it is....you just memorize the denominator and you have both.
Lots of time left...these little things might help you get over the hump if your close.作者: pacmandefense 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
This might be the worst way to look at it but its how I remember it. Take beta of equity and unlever it by "discounting" the leverage from the Beta. In this case leverage is measured by D/E * 1- t. Equity beta / 1 + [D/E * (1- t)], somewhat like the structure of a PV formula. Then after finding the unlevered 'asset' beta, you find the project beta by reapplying the leverage somewhat similar to the FV formula of x * (1+r). In this case x = Beta of asset and r = (1-t)D/e
That's just how I remember it at least, with all this material you got to do whatever it takes.作者: kd26gioi 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
Great idea mpjufl. At this point it doesn't matter if you know it inside-out or just barely can recall it - the point is to get it right on the exam!作者: eagles_dare13 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
I hope to god that isn't tested. I know it will only be one mark if it is, but I will be disappointed if I see it because I just didn't learn it.
I think we will all be pleasantly surprised at how qualitative the exam actually is.作者: smartpants 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
The exam is definitely more qualitative than candidates usually expect.
That being said, the pure-play method is quite an important concept, and is one of the more difficult things in the corp fin section (alongside learning the cost of ST borrowing formulas, which BTW Schweser does not cover).作者: evolsteevol 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
Beatthecfa,
Do you think there's still time to learn the ST borrowing formulas or if we should even try at this point? I have Schweser and never heard of them before.
BTW, thanks for all your help! Just started following AF a few weeks ago and your posts have been extremely helpful.作者: dotamasta 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
It wasn't tested last year. Worst comes to worst it's one of 240 questions.作者: leadcfa 时间: 2011-7-11 18:27
@ chuckrox8 the ST borrowing formula is incredibly easy.
so if its 2/10 net 30 and u pay on day 25. Day 10 is your cutoff here.
[1 + (0.02/0.98) ]^365/15 - 1
= 1.634 - 1 = 0.634
So the annualized cost savings forgone were 63.4%!! this is why its always advantageous to take advantage of trade payables.
The cost as of day 11 goes up very very high, then by day 30 its lower but still very high. The logic is intuitive, if you are offered 2/10 net 30 and you dont pay by day 10, you would never pay somebody on day 11, you would always wait until day 30 because for those extra 20 days, you could earn interest.
