have seen a few ethics questions invloving someone not paying their dues, submitting conduct form, or have membership revoked. answers pertain to suspension, censure (i think), or some sort of public condemnation.
all these things sound very frightening, but what is the actual order and when are they applied?
thanks, john作者: LokiDog2 时间: 2011-7-11 19:43
public censure, suspension, revocation. was on a q bank last night and thats what i remember.作者: orang3eph 时间: 2011-7-11 19:43
what would be an of public censure? having to drink miller lite?作者: jim8z3 时间: 2011-7-11 19:43
Question 34:
Your friend knocks a keg of beer over at the top of a perfectly inelastic demand curve onto an unsuspecting supply curve just minding its own business, doing its own thang. You:
1) N!/bayes theorem x probability of (supernormal growth rates/the variance of a 600 stock portfolio to the square root of 60 individual hypothesis tests on random variables) squared to the function of Standard I(A)
2) WHAT???? 600 stock what?????
3) 14
4) I think Damil4real had a question on this, the answer was.......like 10 or something.....
Answer: According to Standard VII(E), none of the above are correct, but they are also all correct given that none of them are correct when all of them are correctly uncorrected. The ethics manual clearly states this in the unpublished version 10 "In the case of a keg of beer falling on a supply curve, assuming that the answer's correct unless the answer is actually incorrect, which you are just supposed to know, but know that its always incorrect unless its correct, given the fact that it is likely incorrect but answer correct anyways to comply with the standards"
sigh...........I need a vacation作者: Londonrocks 时间: 2011-7-11 19:43
I think our game is definitely on point with all this cool financial lingo, we are sure to get laid on the night of June 6th. Cute girl i met working here at the coffee shop told me to come in and tell her how i did after the test. I told her i couldnt because they dont serve scotch here.作者: ajpheif16 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
The coffee shop I go to to study sometimes is packed with chicks... once I'm done studying I may go there to read a regular book and see if my silver tongue works on things besides reciting formulas. Although this time I'll actually get a haircut, shave, and not wear a dirty hoodie...作者: ramdabom 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
Yeah i will probably get loaded to and start using my laptop for its original use again....Pron. I wish i was back in Santa Barbara. I could go out and play a deaf mute and get action, here, i practically have to bring my personal financial statement and earnings potential out to the bars.作者: dontknow1987 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
BizBanker Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Yeah i will probably get loaded to and start using
> my laptop for its original use again....Pron. I
> wish i was back in Santa Barbara. I could go out
> and play a deaf mute and get action, here, i
> practically have to bring my personal financial
> statement and earnings potential out to the bars.
That definitely would not work for me.作者: MonkeyBusiness 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
To quote a classic in response to a woman on craigslist seeking a rich guy, complaining that she cant find righ guys......
"[I]n economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!
So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage."作者: ogoluwa 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
and here I thought I was being original......dammit.作者: FVPV 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
yeah that email made the ROUNDS when it came out on craigs list. HILARIOUS! true statement though, a woman relying on her looks as her #1 asset is banking on a depreciating position. I live near SF in the East Bay suburbs. I went to grad school in Santa Barbara which was a real mistake considering i was in the 1st year phd econ program and was subject to SoCal girls running around in next to nothing. I would love to live there again. Heaven on earth. the bay area sucks for a social scene, it seems deep down everyone is fairly focused on materiality but they dont show it. at least in SoCal it is evident. No joke, i actually got a girlfriend in SB standing against a wall at a party.作者: JRossSter 时间: 2011-7-11 19:44
Yeah, I live in SD. If you're ever down in these parts, we'll have to grab a beer or eight.
