标题: Research Objectivity Standards [打印本页] 作者: segalm 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45 标题: Research Objectivity Standards
Are they mandatory? Or is it optional for the firm to comply with these? TIA!作者: yodacaia 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
there are several "required" policies and other "recommended" ones.作者: onelife1 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
Is it mandatory for every firm to comply with "required policies" or is it mandatory for only firms claiming compliance with Research Objectivity Standards to comply with "required policies"?作者: WarrenB1 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
I want to say if you are claiming compliance then you better comply with the required policies作者: ap0258 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
Thanks Andrew. My question was more about firms not claiming compliance.
So here this goes for the last time (i hope it won't be ambiguous now):
Do the firms not claiming compliance with research objectivity standards also have to conform to required policies of research objectivity standards?
Thanks again.作者: iteracom 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
not really sure- probably not作者: genuinecfa 时间: 2011-7-11 19:45
They do not. They would have to comply with legal regulations in this country of operation, but the ROS are voluntary. There is probably some regulatory overlap.
To claim compliance, you must adhere to the required ROS. The recommended ROS are 'recommended', ie not required.
