Board logo

标题: Alpha - Beta Separation quiz [打印本页]

作者: cfa10yrplan    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50     标题: Alpha - Beta Separation quiz

Stinky Pinky and Smelly Kelly two equity analysts at Slimy Capital Asset Management (SCAM) are discussing various features of an Alpha Beta Separation approach.

Stinky: In theory it should be easier to generate an alpha using Russell 2000 index than by using S&P 500.

Smelly: Another advantage of the alpha and beta separation approach using Russell 2000 is that it is cheaper to implement short positions in small-cap markets such as stocks in the Russell 2000 index.

A. Stinky and Smelly both are correct

B. Only Stinky is correct

C. Only Smelly is correct
作者: mcmc    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

B

Lower analyst coverage -> More opportunity for mispricing/+ve alpha.
Lower availability of small cap stocks makes stock lending/short selling more expensive
作者: canadiananalyst    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

better be stinky than smelly it seems
B
作者: Analyze_This    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

B - smaller cap names are more inefficient and present opps for alpha generation. However small cap names are also more thinly traded making short positions more difficult/expensive.
作者: bkballa    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

B

NO EXCUSES




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2