Board logo

标题: IRR ambiguity? [打印本页]

作者: mdfb79    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50     标题: IRR ambiguity?

Would someone please explain this further - I got this one wrong; my only reason for my choice between either a or b was my calculator could compute b and not a. What is the diff between a and b?





Q #88553 Qbank

Which of the following cash flow streams is most likely to have multiple IRRs?

Purchase Price Cash Flow 1 Cash Flow 2

A)
$1.0 million $1.0 million gain $0.1 million expense
B)
$1.8 million $10 million gain $9 million expense
C)
$1.7 million $8.0 million gain $5 million gain

Your answer: A was incorrect. The correct answer was B) $1.8 million $10 million gain $9 million expense

When there is a reversal in the sign of the cash flows, it is likely that there will be multiple IRR solutions. In fact, for the cash flow stream {-1.8; 10; -9} the IRRs are 13 and 343%
作者: onelife1    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

calculator only gives you the lowest number....

it will never show you both numbers.
it is something you need to be aware of -> that the calc. will not give you both answers.

recognize multiple changes of sign (direction change in cashflows) produces multiple IRRs.

CP
作者: RepoToronto    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

yes, understood. Choice a has a sign change as does choice b. Which is better?

A: -1, 1, -0.9
B: -1.8, 10, -9

How is one to know that A will not give multiple solutions where B will?
作者: scarecrow    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

but why is A and B different?
作者: yalo    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

A has only one IRR which is negative. If you look at the cashflows, no matter what the discount rate, NPV would be less than zero. The only cash inflow is equal to the initial cash outflow.

I think that may have something to do with it. B can actually have a positive NPV and IRR.
作者: tarunajwani    时间: 2011-7-11 19:50

good answer job##### - i think you've got it.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2