Board logo

标题: Performance Attribution: Simple Question [打印本页]

作者: Iginla2010    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51     标题: Performance Attribution: Simple Question

You are an American with a holding in Japan that moved up in value from 100 to 125 CAD and at the same time the Japanese currency depreciated by 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 90 JPY/USD)

State what are the:

Total Return
Local Return
Return segmented by capital gains, currency and yield.
作者: oneboy    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Total Return = 25% - 10% + (.25*-.1) = 12.5%
Local return = 25%

Cap gains = 25%
curreny = -10%
interaction between CG and currency = -2.5%
作者: aidebaobao    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Trick question, you gave us an asset return measured in CAD and FX returns in USD.

NO EXCUSES
作者: Zestt    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Am I right if Japan currency = CAD?? haha
作者: mcmc    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Sorry CAD is supposed to be JPY.

And believe it or not originally the question I wrote had Mexican Pesos in there!
作者: bpdulog    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

It appears as if the Japanese Yen appreciated and not depreciated as stated in the question.
作者: bboo    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Soccertom9 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are an American with a holding in Japan that
> moved up in value from 100 to 125 CAD and at the
> same time the Japanese currency depreciated by
> 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 90 JPY/USD)
>
> State what are the:
>
> Total Return
> Local Return
> Return segmented by capital gains, currency and
> yield.

Please correct your question...USD or JPY, which one depreciates?
作者: jmh530    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

JPY Depcreciates. 100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD
作者: Colum    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

This is a really tricky question guys
作者: bodhisattva    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

total return: 38.89%
local : 25%
作者: thommo77    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

(125/110 - 100/100) / 100/100 = 13.636

Return Local (125/100 = 25%)
Currency Return (1/110 - 1/100 = -9.1%)

Contribution effects = -.091(1.25) = -11.36

25 - 9.1 - 2.27 = 13.63%.
or
25 - 11.36 = 13.63%

Final answer.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Friday, May 27, 2011 at 01:47PM by Paraguay.
作者: liangfeng    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

You are an American with a holding in Japan that moved up in value from 100 to 125 JPY and at the same time the Japanese currency depreciated by 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD)

State what are the:

Total Return
Local Return
Return segmented by capital gains, currency and yield.

Total return: R=(125/100)*[(1/110)/(1/100)]-1=1.136-1=13.6%
Local return=125/100-1=25%

R(cg)=25%
R(currency)=13.6%-25%=-11.4%
R(yield)=0
作者: PalacioHill    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

deriv108 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You are an American with a holding in Japan that
> moved up in value from 100 to 125 JPY and at the
> same time the Japanese currency depreciated by
> 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD)
>
> State what are the:
>
> Total Return
> Local Return
> Return segmented by capital gains, currency and
> yield.
>
> Total return:
> R=(125/100)*[(1/110)/(1/100)]-1=1.136-1=13.6%
> Local return=125/100-1=25%
>
> R(cg)=25%
> R(currency)=13.6%-25%=-11.4%
> R(yield)=0

I hate their rounding, it is so very inconsistent.

In 2000 exam they had a PV factor that was taken out 9 places. 9 places. At least 2 places after the decimal seems logical however.
作者: Valores    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

I came up with the same thing:

Total Return = 13.6%
Local Return = 25%
Return segmented by capital gains, currency and yield.

Cap gains = 25%
Yield = 0%
Currency = 13.6 - 25 = -11.4%
作者: ll11    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

BTW, 100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD ==>

JPY's depreciation: 100/110-1 = -9.1%, which is not exactly -10%.

Currency question could be very tricky, like this one.
作者: infinitybenzo    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

Paraguay Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> deriv108 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You are an American with a holding in Japan
> that
> > moved up in value from 100 to 125 JPY and at
> the
> > same time the Japanese currency depreciated by
> > 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD)
> >
> > State what are the:
> >
> > Total Return
> > Local Return
> > Return segmented by capital gains, currency and
> > yield.
> >
> > Total return:
> > R=(125/100)*[(1/110)/(1/100)]-1=1.136-1=13.6%
> > Local return=125/100-1=25%
> >
> > R(cg)=25%
> > R(currency)=13.6%-25%=-11.4%
> > R(yield)=0
>
> I hate their rounding, it is so very inconsistent.
>
>
> In 2000 exam they had a PV factor that was taken
> out 9 places. 9 places. At least 2 places after
> the decimal seems logical however.

Agreed...I believe your approach is much faster, but it's too late for me to learn your way to solve this kind of problem. The result look the same.
作者: Unforseen    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

deriv108 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Paraguay Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > deriv108 Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > You are an American with a holding in Japan
> > that
> > > moved up in value from 100 to 125 JPY and at
> > the
> > > same time the Japanese currency depreciated
> by
> > > 10%. (100 JPY/USD to 110 JPY/USD)
> > >
> > > State what are the:
> > >
> > > Total Return
> > > Local Return
> > > Return segmented by capital gains, currency
> and
> > > yield.
> > >
> > > Total return:
> > > R=(125/100)*[(1/110)/(1/100)]-1=1.136-1=13.6%
> > > Local return=125/100-1=25%
> > >
> > > R(cg)=25%
> > > R(currency)=13.6%-25%=-11.4%
> > > R(yield)=0
> >
> > I hate their rounding, it is so very
> inconsistent.
> >
> >
> > In 2000 exam they had a PV factor that was
> taken
> > out 9 places. 9 places. At least 2 places
> after
> > the decimal seems logical however.
>
> Agreed...I believe your approach is much faster,
> but it's too late for me to learn your way to
> solve this kind of problem. The result look the
> same.

As long as you know how to get the answer that is all that matters.
作者: IAmNeil    时间: 2011-7-11 19:51

FML I suck at this.

When do we use that lovely formula for total return????

local return + foreign currency appreciation + (local ret*foreign currency)

seems like this would have been the question for that....

25% + -10% + (.25*-.1)
作者: mar350    时间: 2011-7-11 19:52

june2009 thats why I posted this question because I made the same mistake just now. You got caught in my little trap haha.

At least now we will both not do that on the exam!




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2