Board logo

标题: Levering Your Beta (Not in Front of The Kids, Honey) [打印本页]

作者: torontoanalyst    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53     标题: Levering Your Beta (Not in Front of The Kids, Honey)

There are two different beta adjustment descriptions for thinly traded companies.

Be it that im nto a mathemetician and I suck at seeing relationships, they may be the same,

Dne describes the betas as asset and equity and the otehr as levered and unlevered


Whats the difference between these


o ΒEquity = Beta Asset/ [E/ D/E]

o ΒAsset = ΒEquity x [E / D/E]


And these

Bunlevered = [1/ (1+D/E)]Be
Be = [1+ (D/E)]Bu




Thanks

Rolo
作者: SFoyil    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53

First two - did you mean to say

E/(D+E)

if so - they are the same... what they talk about in Equity, and what they talk about in the LBO method... (PE Chapter, Alt Inv).

CP
作者: ppls    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53

I don't know why de-levering Beta has to be so confusing...

To de-lever Beta, simply divide it by the leverage ratio A/E. To re-lever Beta with a different capital structure, multiply by A/E.

Someone please jump in if I have missed something.
作者: chandsingh    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53

TheDooner64, I think you are right, I hadn't noticed how simple it really is.

Tho you did forget the tax shield, tho:
Delevered beta with taxes: divide by (1 + (1-t) x D/E)
Relevered beta with taxes: multiply by (1 + (1-t) x D/E)

Intuitively, is it fair to say that as you add debt to a capital structure you expect the riskieness of the the overall company to decrease, since debt is viewed as less risky?
作者: tobeornottobe    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53

zoya Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> TheDooner64, I think you are right, I hadn't
> noticed how simple it really is.
>
> Tho you did forget the tax shield, tho:
> Delevered beta with taxes: divide by (1 + (1-t) x
> D/E)
> Relevered beta with taxes: multiply by (1 + (1-t)
> x D/E)
>
> Intuitively, is it fair to say that as you add
> debt to a capital structure you expect the
> riskieness of the the overall company to decrease,
> since debt is viewed as less risky?

You don't need to include the tax shield, since you are accounting for it when you run your cash flows. You either incorporate it into the rate or calculate it separately, but not both.

NO EXCUSES
作者: giants2010    时间: 2011-7-11 19:53

Funny thread title. I chuckled.

That is all.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2