Board logo

标题: Option Binomial [打印本页]

作者: hw0799    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59     标题: Option Binomial

So, the Schweser material says that you calculate a down move at 1/U while in the CFAI EOC they always tell you that the up is 20% and down is say, 15%. In the few cases that I checked the CFAI material down never equaled 1/U.

Does anyone know how this will be presented on the exam?
作者: SFoyil    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

I'm not sure if you are talking about the value of the move or the probability of it. But they would both have to be calculated.
作者: busterbluth    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

Value. for example Schweser in their book will give you the value of up at 1.33 they then say you calculate the value of down as 1/1.33.

In CFAI they give you value of up and value of down in terms of percent.

I can solve the CFAI fine but what has me confused is why Schweser does it this way and which should we expect on the exam
作者: luda002    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

Is the CFAI automatically giving you the risk neutral probabilities? I didn't use the CFAI text to learn this material.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 02:19PM by KSTHANE.
作者: ppls    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

from what i know, its just about how you decide to model volatility

a common way is to do down=1/up

CFAI could be using some other model and giving you the up and the down, so just use what they give you
作者: lucasg85    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

I know that Schweser uses D = 1/U. I think that's incorrect.
On the exam, you'll likely be given the size of the up and down movements just like the CFAI text does.

In real life, size of up and down moves are calculated using permutation.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, May 18, 2011 at 03:53PM by Iginla2010.
作者: SeanWest    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

So how do you calculate the risk neutral probabilities if they give you the size of the up move as a percent? Let's say the size of an up move is 40% for example? It doesn't work to use the formula I have which is 1+Rf-D/U - D
作者: yalo    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

^ are you talking about the "size of movements" or the probabilities (Pi up, Pi Down). Because the formula you mentioned above is used to calculate the Pi
作者: chandsingh    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

I want to know how you calculate Pi when the size of the movements isn't given in decimal form (like 1.33), and is instead given in percentage form (like 15%).
作者: needhelp1700    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

For example, if they give you the size of an up move as 1.33 then the formula would come out (let's say risk free rate is 5%)

1+.05-(1/1.33) / 1.33-.75 = .51 So the risk neutral probability of an up move (pi) is 51%

If they give the movement size as a percent, the above formula doesn't work. So how do you do it when they give the movement size as a percent instead.
作者: kkn006    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

Well, if the stock goes up by 15%, the size is 1+ 0.15 = 1.15
If it goes down by 15%, the size is 1-0.15 = 0.85

Helps?
作者: chaojimali    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

Well don't I feel stupid.

So the original poster is basically questioning why Schweser's method gives the down move size as .87 instead of .85.
作者: 5566    时间: 2011-7-11 19:59

This is obviously wrong in Schweser's. There is no choice here, this is straightforward. If a stock is at $100 and it can go up by 15% or down by 10%, then it can only have these two values: Either 115 or 90. You are always told what these percentages are.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2