标题: Most unbeleiveable Result.. [打印本页] 作者: w1977 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24 标题: Most unbeleiveable Result..
I have Seen a result of my friend and that was the Most unbelievable result i have everrrrrr seen and it is
alternative < 50
quantitative 50-70
and rest of all the 8 subjects are above 70+ how can it be a Band 10
i was shocked totally and u will too...作者: Londonrocks 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24
Assuming this person barely got >70% in the 8 subjects and did horribly in the two above, it's quite easy to believe:
Let's say:
AI 2/8
Quant 15/28
Deriv 9/12
PM 9/12
CF 15/20
FSA 34/48
Equity 17/24
Ec. 17/24
FI 20/28
Ethics 26/36
Total score 164/240 = 68.3333%
Assuming MPS was 69%, he would have failed.作者: JGovender 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24
tj2001 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Assuming this person barely got >70% in the 8
> subjects and did horribly in the two above, it's
> quite easy to believe:
>
> Let's say:
>
> AI 2/8
> Quant 15/28
>
> Deriv 9/12
> PM 9/12
> CF 15/20
>
> FSA 34/48
> Equity 17/24
> Ec. 17/24
> FI 20/28
> Ethics 26/36
>
> Total score 164/240 = 68.3333%
>
> Assuming MPS was 69%, he would have failed.
True - this gives an idea that MPS was really higher than our thoughts
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, January 26, 2011 at 06:12AM by Omar Adnan.作者: ishfaque 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24
weird, b/c my results weren't much better, in fact they were worse, yet i passed...
alt <50
quant, corp fin, ethics 50-70
all else 70+作者: bapswarrior 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24
There is a BIG difference between a 71 and a 100 in a large topic. The 70+ bracket just doesnt tell us enough.作者: dcfox83 时间: 2011-7-13 13:24
Agreed!
You guys are wasting your time working through all these permutations. The intervals are too broad. It won't change anything anyway! Hard as it may be.. its best to move on
yodacaia Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> There is a BIG difference between a 71 and a 100
> in a large topic. The 70+ bracket just doesnt
> tell us enough.
