Board logo

标题: Should Wall Street Journal be verified? [打印本页]

作者: cfa10yrplan    时间: 2011-7-13 13:52     标题: Should Wall Street Journal be verified?

Is this a violation:Using statements from the Wall Street Journal’s report on Simpson without verifying them.
作者: justin88    时间: 2011-7-13 13:52

Verified or cited?
作者: Analyze_This    时间: 2011-7-13 13:52

is it a violation of not verified?
is it a violation of not cited?

thanks~
作者: NakedPuts00    时间: 2011-7-13 13:53

does anyone know about it.....
作者: aidebaobao    时间: 2011-7-13 13:53

This is what Schweser mentioned;
-------------------
To avoid plagiarism, maintain records of all materials used to generate reports or other
firm products and properly cite sources (quotes and summaries) in work products.
Information from recognized financial and statistical reporting services need not be
cited.

-----------------

So it seems like S&P500 is a recognized financial and statistical reporting services which need not be cited
作者: Valores    时间: 2011-7-13 13:53

so wall street journal should be cited?




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2