标题: Does it get closer than this... [打印本页] 作者: metoyoushe 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57 标题: Does it get closer than this...
Level 1: Fail
The table below illustrates your subject matter strengths and weaknesses. The three columns on the right are marked with asterisks to indicate your performance on each question or topic area.
Performance band of your overall score among all candidates who failed the exam: 10
Now if I'm doing it right..... the 40/60/80 method. That puts me at a 72%. Kind of feel I got robbed with this score. From what I hear Retabulation is a waist of money.作者: waldziuchna 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
I can understand your frustration as I'm in the same shoes (your score is even better than mine).
Performance band of your overall score among all candidates who failed the exam: 10
I think I would still go for Retabulation, so that do not keep thinking about it and hence would be worth $100. Though I have not heard any case where the result was changed afterwards and I kinda feel that its discouraged. Still, no harm trying - nothing to lose!作者: Jolyn 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
I am not a big fan of 40/60/80 method, 35/55/75 (that's 68%) is more conservative and realistic, unless you have a good guess where you fell in each of the ranges. You probably were about 5-7 questions away from passing so I am pretty sure you will nail it the next time.作者: kasinkei 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
That's the drawback to the new band system. You know just how close to victory you came. You'll hammer it the next time.作者: Matori 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
That is pretty sick, especially considering you got >70% in ethics.作者: Bluetick1010 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
You must have been around 50% on FRA. I would find an accounting review course if I were you and make it a strength instead of a weakness. Level two FRA is a large percentage of that exam just like in L1.作者: scr879 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
bid_offer_shark Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I am not a big fan of 40/60/80 method, 35/55/75
> (that's 68%) is more conservative and realistic,
> unless you have a good guess where you fell in
> each of the ranges. You probably were about 5-7
> questions away from passing so I am pretty sure
> you will nail it the next time.
What is the 40/60/80 method?作者: waldziuchna 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
Use the search function, and you'll find a lot of discussion about retabulation. Unless you did a lot of erasing and left your scantron smudged on MANY questions, all retabulation will do is cost you money. No one on the forum to my knowledge has turned a fail ot a pass by this route.作者: sdada 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
wow how did you fail with this score when someone passed with this?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not sure how I passed with this breakdown, but I did, so I'm happy
Level 1: Pass
The table below illustrates your subject matter strengths and weaknesses. The three columns on the right are marked with asterisks to indicate your performance on each question or topic area.
hasan, my frnd u should try get a retabulation.if there is anyone who can pass after retab, it has to be you..best of luck作者: ogoluwa 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
MikeCPA Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You must have been around 50% on FRA. I would
> find an accounting review course if I were you and
> make it a strength instead of a weakness. Level
> two FRA is a large percentage of that exam just
> like in L1.
I agree- if you were 60-70 in FRA you would have most likely passed, and FRA is the biggest section.
You also were probably just over 70 in a few other of the bigger categories.作者: ramzes 时间: 2011-7-13 13:57
ks112 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wow how did you fail with this score when someone
> passed with this?
> --------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>
>
> Not sure how I passed with this breakdown, but I
> did, so I'm happy
>
> Level 1: Pass
>
> The table below illustrates your subject matter
> strengths and weaknesses. The three columns on the
> right are marked with asterisks to indicate your
> performance on each question or topic area.
>
>
> Multiple Choice
> Q# Topic Max Pts <=50% 51%-70% >70%
> - Alternative Investments 8 * - -
> - Corporate Finance 20 - - *
> - Derivatives 12 * - -
> - Economics 24 - * -
> - Equity Investments 24 - - *
> - Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - - *
> - Financial Reporting & Analysis 48 - * -
> - Fixed Income Investments 28 * - -
> - Portfolio Management 12 - - *
> - Quantitative Methods 28 - - *
