标题: HUGE disparities between CFAI vs. Schweser [打印本页] 作者: maratikus 时间: 2011-7-13 15:54 标题: HUGE disparities between CFAI vs. Schweser
I've been focusing on CFAI books this year as I find HUGE disparities between CFAI and Schweser (in terms or wordings on the questions, the topics CFAI focus on vs. what Schweser focuses on, etc...) I went back and took some of the exams on Qbanks and many times found myself completely lost (i.e. on some of the question, I really had no idea what Schweser is really asking) Is it just me who feels this way? or maybe I m doomed and have to go back and use Schweser for next year's test?作者: Analyze_This 时间: 2011-7-13 15:54
At L2 Schweser is weak all around... QBank, practice exams, errata - you name it.作者: ninja1024 时间: 2011-7-13 15:54
StatsArb Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've been focusing on CFAI books this year as I
> find HUGE disparities between CFAI and Schweser
> (in terms or wordings on the questions, the topics
> CFAI focus on vs. what Schweser focuses on,
> etc...) I went back and took some of the exams on
> Qbanks and many times found myself completely lost
> (i.e. on some of the question, I really had no
> idea what Schweser is really asking) Is it just
> me who feels this way? or maybe I m doomed and
> have to go back and use Schweser for next year's
> test?
I noticed the same thing. However, I am a Stalla user that is supplementing with Schweser materials. There are items that Schweser focuses on that I haven't seen anywhere else. When in doubt, I usually refer to the LOS.
