Board logo

标题: Please explain this statement [打印本页]

作者: parott    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55     标题: Please explain this statement

A receiver swaption is equivalent to a call option.
作者: cv4cfa    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

receiver swaption = right to receive fixed-rate = valuable if interest rate falls = call option on bond
作者: SpyAli    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

it is equivalent to a call option on a bond because they both benefit when interest rates fall. in a receiver swaption, you pay floating and receive fixed, therefore your betting on rates to fall.

similarly in a call option in a bond , you are betting that interest rates will fall, hence you get to buy the bond at cheaper price. remember that the price of bonds and interest rates are inversely related.
作者: ryanlb    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

that's it right there. I just packed that freakin' statement and locked it on the right side of my brain until Saturday at 4:05PM.
作者: b_sea93    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

but if u r receiving floating, won't you be getting less money when interest rate falls? And you'll be paying a fixed rate that would be higher than the lower interest rate? How's that what you want?
作者: redskins44    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

No it's the right to receive fixed not floating so you would benefit if the interest rate falls. You would pay a cheap rare and receive a high rate
作者: BelalM    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

***



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, June 1, 2011 at 02:13AM by Damil4real.
作者: jarobi04    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

canadiananalyst Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No it's the right to receive fixed not floating so
> you would benefit if the interest rate falls. You
> would pay a cheap rare and receive a high rate


oh yeah, my bad.
作者: 5566    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

the confusion for me in this problem which i think you got from either schweser or stalla, is it doesn't say a call option on a bond or on rates. They would specify on the test i believe.
作者: RMontgomery    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

They won't...they want you to figure out what makes sense. Only call on bond will make sense here.
作者: Rasec    时间: 2011-7-13 15:55

I agree, they don't need to give extra details when the answer is possible to find without them...as well the answers are most likely given the information given...no need for irrelevant information
作者: YAhmed    时间: 2011-7-13 15:56

Dreary - it's correct. Call option on bond means you get to buy the bond at a cheaper price. If the rate is below the coupon, the bond should be traded at a premium. If you have a call option, you could buy it for a lower price.

AndrewUNH - Think of swaps as two bonds. The receiver swap holder buys a fixed paying bond and pays a float-rate bond in return.
作者: ayodayo    时间: 2011-7-13 15:56

my bad, I read his reply as if he was saying that the bond price will be lower/cheaper, but you said it right, nicely too: receiver swaption = right to receive fixed-rate = valuable if interest rate falls = call option on bond




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2