Board logo

标题: in a down market... [打印本页]

作者: krause2    时间: 2011-7-13 16:00     标题: in a down market...

would you take more risk by correlating your asset returns with your pension returns or would that be considered less risky?

According to Schweser its less and I fail to see the reasoning. If you have a low risk tolerance, wouldnt you want to have less correlation between your pension returns and operations returns? If operations do poor, your pension would do well and not require a contribution. If operations do well, you have enough to offset the decline in the pension by making additional contributions.

Schweser says " a high correlation of pension asset returns with a firms operations indicates a low risk tolerance. For example, the ability of the firm to make contribution will be low at the same time that the plan is underfunded" Question 2, pg 76 Book 2

Am I missing something or is this errata?
作者: Zestt    时间: 2011-7-13 16:00

nevermind. they mean a high correlation with a pension liability which makes sense.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2