I do not understand why the answer is B? I thought in today's world you can focus more on "industry/sector" diversification than "country" diversification.作者: PalacioHill 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
I just read it again, if you read the statement it says he should diversify across industries in the UK, but not anywhere else.
Makes sense.
NO EXCUSES作者: bodhisattva 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
But he does say "most U.K. companies have an international presence, we should focus on diversifying across different industries in the U.K. and not worry about diversifying globally across different countries.”
So he is right - not worry about country diversification but focus on industry. The answer provided by CFAI, Option B talks about international diversification - which in my mind is wrong.作者: Valores 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
Doesn't matter, you're still limiting yourself to UK companies. He will still benefit from diversification from investing in different industries and countries.
NO EXCUSES作者: Colum 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
And it's just been confirmed on my flashcard app. You can't receive the full diversification benefits without diversifying in both countries and industries.
NO EXCUSES作者: justin88 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
Okay - so the way I look at it - industries gets you some (international) diversification, but you have to spread across countries also.作者: liangfeng 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
Badabing
NO EXCUSES作者: dyga 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
Global investing relies on international diversification and industry diversification.作者: infinitybenzo 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
Downfall to investing in only domestic companies (even if global presence):
1. Limited diversification
2. All industries may not be present
3. Assuming that the domestic company is the best in the industry worldwide.作者: nannan66 时间: 2011-7-13 16:13
All the industries in th UK are still affected by the same political and local economic forces. You need country diversification in addition to industry diversification.
