Board logo

标题: National Rifle Association Blows It Away -- Mnemonics [打印本页]

作者: Zesty    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27     标题: National Rifle Association Blows It Away -- Mnemonics

Not a political statement, the only way I could remember macro attribution breakdown:

NRABIA

Net Contributions
Risk Free Asset
Asset Categories (pure indexing)
Benchmarks (passive investment in managers' style indexes)
Individual Managers (impact of active mana
Allocation Effects (plug figure if managers deviate from policy)



Anybody else got stupid ways they remember some of the more non-intuitive stuff?
作者: mar350    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

CFASniper Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> brilliant

A member of National Rifle Association?
作者: mp3bu    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

deriv108 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> CFASniper Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > brilliant
>
> A member of National Rifle Association?

Not at all, my friend. I am not even in the US of A. I only snipe the CFA exams....not people or animals.
作者: oneboy    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

alas, can't claim ownership of this one, but its v. useful, read it elsewhere on af:
for the taylor rule, think ET: expected - target

s.t. Roptimal = Rneutral + .5 (Expected gdp - Target gdp) + .5 (Expected infl - Target infl)

ET
作者: bkballa    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

i'm sure also everyone w. Schweser has seen SAMURAI for desirable index characteristics:
S = specified in advance
A = appropriate
M = measurable
U = unambiguous
R = relevant
A = agreed upon by manager (i.e. "owned" in CFAI)
I = investable

its helped me alot
作者: Analti_Calte    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

zoya Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> alas, can't claim ownership of this one, but its
> v. useful, read it elsewhere on af:
> for the taylor rule, think ET: expected - target
>
> s.t. Roptimal = Rneutral + .5 (Expected gdp -
> Target gdp) + .5 (Expected infl - Target infl)
>
> ET

good one.
作者: nannan66    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

just thought of a good one !
how bout the four approaches to FX forecasts:
PEPSI

P = PPP
E = Economic strength
P = balance of Payments
SI = Savings & Investments
作者: Windjam    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

"PRICS"

PPP
Relative Strength
Capital Inflows
Savings/Investment Imbalancee

NO EXCUSES
作者: wake2000    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

zoya Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> i'm sure also everyone w. Schweser has seen
> SAMURAI for desirable index characteristics:
> S = specified in advance
> A = appropriate
> M = measurable
> U = unambiguous
> R = relevant
> A = agreed upon by manager (i.e. "owned" in CFAI)
> I = investable
>
> its helped me alot

Have to say, this one is worth its weight in gold. Like hell if I can remember what the middle 5 letters are otherwise.
作者: Iginla2011    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

These are some mnemonics I use. I don't know about anyone else, but I find mnemonics to be the best when they are in the form of a saying or a story, and have a prompt as to what the question is inside of the mnemonic.

This may or may not help anyone - I just know it helps me remember things.

[note to moderators: I read over the terms and conditions, if any of this is inappropriate, I apologize and please delete this post. I find some of the mnemonics I remember the best are rather lewd]

For calculating the components of implementation shortfall:

"I 'MISSED the CHANCE' to 'SEE' the 'BOO''BIES"
MTOC = (c - b)/b ...
MTOC = (cancellation - bench)/(bench) * (# not filled)/(# ordered)


"I 'DELAYED' 'ONE DAY to SEE' the 'BOO'BIES'"
Delay Costs = (1day c - b)/b ...
Delay Costs = (1 day close - bench)/(bench) * (#filled)/(#ordered)

"I 'REALIZED my LOSS' when I 'EXECUTED' 'ONE DAY later and SAW' the 'BOOB'"
Realized Loss = (execution - 1 day c)/b
Realized Loss = (execution - 1 day close)/bench * (#filled)/(#ordered)

Types of Common Benchmarks:

For this one, I remember a little saying I made up.

"Society has some COMMON BENCHMARKS for success with women. I have my own CUSTOM: In this UNIVERSE, there are BROADS with true STYLE. ABSOLUTEly, you gotta RETURN those that're just MODELs"

Custom - Custom Benchmark
Universe - Manager Universe
Broads - Broad Market Indices
Style - Style Indices
Absolute - Absolute
Return - Returns Based
Model - Factor Model

4 characteristics of algorithmic trading:

"Algorithms are made by nerds, and nerds have sex with girlfriends. When you have sex with your girlfriend, you're often going through the motions according to SET RULES. It has the potential to turn what's BIG INTO SMALL. Yet it's less RISKy, less EXPENSIVE, and doesn't IMPACT and cause drama in your life"

Automates according to set rules
Breaks big orders into small orders
Minimizes trading cost and risk
Minimizes market impact

Types of Moral Hazard:

Does anyone here follow hockey? For this one, I think of a stereotypical lazy Russian hockey player.

"They don't give enough effort" - Insufficient Effort
"They are a puck hog" - Self Dealing
"They give up the easy play to make the spectacular play" - Investing in Extravagant Projects
"They aren't a team player - make the team adjust to them" - Entrenchment

Types of stress tests:

"I get stressed out when I'm either working as an ANALYST or dating a MODEL. At work, I could deal with the stress by either doing my own STYLE or ACTUALly blow up at everyone. When dating, you can 'PUSH her away - it's a FACT she'll come back', you can GUARD your heart against LOSS, or you can wonder, "what the WORST CASE SCENARIO if I dump her"?

Scenario Analysis
- Stylized Scenarios
- Actual Extreme Events

Stressing Models
- Factor Push
- Max loss optimization
- Worst case scenario

Issues arising from recommending alternative investments:

I live in China, which is an ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENT in human capital. In China, people love CS; but there's also a number of STD that people get from soliciting prostitutes.

In CS (counterstrike) it's important to
Communicate
Suitability (I don't like CS, it's not a suitable game to me)

When soliciting a prostitute, some common troubles are:
Size mismatch
Tax (the money you pay)
Decision (do I really want to do this?)

Communication with Clients
Suitability to Portfolio
Size of Position Needed
Tax Issues
Decision risk

Sources of Excess return in Int'l bond investing:

When Americans go abroad, many times people say we do things to EXCESS. We eat lots of fatty fast food, we drink alot, and we are promiscuous.
MCD - BAC - ASS
M-C-D - BA - CA - SS
(This one is goofy because you need to split apart the 'BA' and 'CA')
Market Selection
Currency Selection
Duration Management
Investing outside a BENCHMARK that's APPROPRIATE
Credit Analysis
Sector Selection

What to look for when filling in the Risk part of the IPS for an individual:
"Liquidity 2 FIST"

Liquidity Needs Relative to Port. (2-3% is small)
Flexibility
Goal Importance
Size of Portfolio
Time Horizon

Due Diligence Checkpoints for Alternative Investments:
"People Descending down a checklist"
People Descend
PEOPDSD

Assess Persistence of Market Opportunity
Assess Edge in getting that Opportunity
Assess Organization
Assess People
Assess Deal Structure and Terms
Assess Service Providers
Assess Documents

Biases in Hedge Fund Indices:
"Those hedge fund guys are a bunch of conservatives. Conservatives think even PBS is biased!"
PBS

Popularity Bias
Backfill Bias
Survivorship Bias
作者: infinitybenzo    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

mthmchris Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> When Americans go abroad, many times people say we
> do things to EXCESS. We eat lots of fatty fast
> food, we drink alot, and we are promiscuous.
> MCD - BAC - ASS
> M-C-D - BA - CA - SS
> (This one is goofy because you need to split apart
> the 'BA' and 'CA')
> Market Selection
> Currency Selection
> Duration Management
> Investing outside a BENCHMARK that's APPROPRIATE
> Credit Analysis
> Sector Selection
>

Brilliant stuff. This one I remember by using McDonalds (MCD) Sells Chicken Internationally

Market Selection
Currency Selection
Duration Management
Sector Allocation
Credit Analysis
Investing outside the benchmark that's appropriate
作者: susana    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

bump. brilliant!
作者: ll11    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

For the taylor rule, if you get confused on which one goes first, forecast or trend, just think of the alphabet, F comes before T
作者: Colum    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

for micro attrib i think PB=peanut butter=portfolio-benchmark.

Works for pure sector allocation weights
works for within sector returns
works for interaction effect for weights and returns

Samurai = benchmark
delhi = asset classes
c-putter = emergin market risk
ocraps = traps in forecasting
作者: lcw77    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

zoya, feel free to use the "ET rule", it was meant to be spread and I don't know if I was the first to think of it
作者: mcmc    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

So this isn't a pneumonic in a sense but those of us who constantly flub the Return requirement calc, I think of TIT(s) (tee hee hee... I said a dirty word!)

Taxes - are you incorporating taxes in all the numbers? Are they all pre or after tax? Have you taken away the taxes or alternatively given tax breaks where they are due?

Inflation - are some of those expenses/inflows subject to inflation? Are you adjusting it right either inflating or (perhaps in a rare case) de-inflating it? Which leads us to...

Time - are the balances, inflows and outflows in the right time? Are you using this years income for next years return needs (in which case adjust)? Are you accounting for changes through time for the portfolio? Are there returns on the portfolio that you havent thought of?

TIT...
作者: mp3bu    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

Risk factors that should be incorporated into an ERM:

Melty Liquid Chocolate SMORS

Financial Factors:

Market Risk
Liquidity Risk
Credit Risk

Non-Financial:

Settlement Risk
Model Risk
Operational Risk
Regulatory Risk
Soveriegn Risk
作者: NakedPuts2011    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

Implementation Shortfall = Commisions Not Really Opportune

Commisions = Cost of Commissions / (Benchmark Price * Total Order)

Not filled Order = (Decision Price – Benchmark Price)/Benchmark Price * Filled Shares/Total Shares

Realized Profit = (Execution Price – Decision Price)/ Benchmark Price * Filled Shares/Total Shares

Opportunity Cost of missed trade = (Closing Price-Benchmark)/Benchmark * Unfilled Shares/Total Shares
作者: zwjy    时间: 2011-7-13 16:27

These are REALLY helpful for me, anyone have any more?

Perhaps Behavioral finance?




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2