标题: Schweser vs CFA books [打印本页] 作者: Daniel1985 时间: 2011-7-16 16:46 标题: Schweser vs CFA books
Do the Schweser notes cover everything? What if you did not even open the CFA books and strictly relied on Schweser. How much are you truly missing out on??作者: bleach 时间: 2011-7-16 17:22
Last year I think Schweser skipped over Ibbotson Chen. I think that was like the only thing I remember hearing complaints about.作者: noel 时间: 2011-7-16 17:39
jpsi1 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not much
Thanks
I bought e-book version and tried to open it at work. They blocked the program so I didn't even bother with them
Lets hope I don't get fked作者: IAmNeil 时间: 2011-7-16 17:57
Well, the EOCs are useful. The rest of it not so much, there's a lot of 'filler' that can really impede retention.作者: adehbone 时间: 2011-7-16 18:14
Agree with grumble. EOCs are useful for review, but I guess it is a bit late for that.作者: Wendy01 时间: 2011-7-16 18:32
I passed last year using only Schweser and CFAI EOC multiple choice questions作者: skycfa 时间: 2011-7-16 18:50
Just skipped over Ibbotsen Chen tonight too. Saw it and thought, "Nah...."作者: ryanlb 时间: 2011-7-16 19:07
I think Schweser actually does include the Ibbotsen-Chen, it's just astriced I believe, so it's hard to catch...it's like a footnote. Either way...what are the odds of 2 years in a row?
