标题: For those that passed L3 the first time [打印本页] 作者: dontknow1987 时间: 2011-8-17 08:56 标题: For those that passed L3 the first time
Congratulations to all L3 passers. I'm sure the wait was unbearable.
For those that passed L3 the first time, what did you use to study? In particular, I am curious about the quality of the DVDs / video lectures.
* Schweser = I've heard mixed reviews
* Stalla = A few have said the DVDs are not great (in particular Degraf and Jones). Dave Heatherinton is better. Did he cover a lot of the material this year?
* Other providers (FinQuiz, Creighton, ?) <== not sure who else has videos
Thanks for any feedback.作者: bkballa 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
I did the 3-day review seminar (online) provided by Schweser. I don't think it mattered that it was Schweser but having a concentrated review of 20-25 hours during the last week, with most concepts covered, was very valuable in helping me to "peak" before Saturday.作者: himanshumh 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
I used Schweser for all three levels and passed all three on my first attempt. The videos served as my "first pass" on the material each time. The quality of the videos at levels one and two were - my opinion, obviously - excellent. At level II in particular, they do a nice job combining spoken word with images and breaking down harder topics.
Level III, the quality of the videos goes down noticeably. In particular, Greg Filbeck presents about half of the material, and he is an extremely boring presenter - just mainly reading the slides on your screen, little diversions or mnemonics that help make the material come alive. The worst part is, I've heard that he's an excellent presenter in person. That may be, but he's pretty weak on tape.
Be that as it may, I still passed using Schweser for all three levels, but I was pretty disappointed with the videos for level three - the other presenters (Marc Lefevre and Andy Holmes and the others) were still good, but shame on Kaplan for giving by far the weakest instructor half the material...
My advice is definitely get the schweser books, mocks, and Qbank. If you can do a live class or an online class, you may get a better experience than the level III videos. Also, they redo the videos each year, so perhaps it'll be better in 2012.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Every body do not forget I can clear describe my case ; I am not crazy ! I talk the truth only.
-qqqbee作者: lunarfollies 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
I like the Finquiz question bank and mock exam. Well worth the price.
NO EXCUSES作者: YAhmed 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
I used schwesers video, quicksheet, and cfai (eoc and examples). Didn't have the time to do mock and samples (wasted my time on worthless qbank).作者: onelife1 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
You've passed 2 levels. If you don't have your own view by now, you never will.
And you will never be a decent analyst either as most insightful analyst calls are based on much less info than you have to answer your own question.作者: former 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
I put in well over 700h, taking 6 weeks off work before the exam and doing all exercises, CFAI and Schwesers, including the EOC and in-chapter examples of the CFAI books. I found Schwesers 3 day problem workbook to best match the actual exam difficulty, everything else in terms of multiple choice seemed too easy. I used the QBank puerly for retention.
I passed over the material about four times: First reading Schweser notes plus cross checking CFAI books whether Schweser missed something I considered interesting or important (I figured, everything CFAI does an example on is something I should keep in mind). Second, I watched the online class recording and checking the notes for anything I missed or to note a faster calculation or better way to remember things. Third, as soon as the Secret Sauce arrived I reviewed Schweser notes and consolidated all my personal notes from the CFAI books, the online class and Schweser notes into the Secret Sauce. The Secret Sauce omitted some areas I found important or required more context to understand. Fourth and finally, I did two sets of QBank exams for each area, one of purely advanced questions and one of easy/normal questions. I reviewed my edited Secret Sauce and then took the advanced exam that same day, and the easy ones in the morning of the following. This happend right before starting to hit exams. I alwasy printed QBank exams and took them paper based. This allowed me to review mistakes right before going to bed, and to ensure I don't make mistakes twice.
About two weeks before the exam I started to build my personal list of formulas (about 16 pages of calculations or logical steps to remember) and tried to write each formula by memory until I could do 80% correct in 3 hours time. Also about two weeks prior to the exam I started to take the first Schweser exams under exam conditions, and a second and third in the last week. In between I took two CFAI morning exams. I scored between 63 and 77% based on my own grading of these CFAI morning exams. I never really practiced the afternoon part of the exam, this may be a reason I found the PM session exceptionally difficult, even though I scored surprisingly well.
Best of luck to everybody.作者: Otabek 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
You're a beast egal.
I went cfai text and creighton bootcamp. Depends on how you learn, but I highly recommend the bootcamp.
_____________________________________________________
-My friend QQQbbe, we will never forget you.作者: IAmNeil 时间: 2011-8-17 08:57
CFAI only... perused the text three times. That does it作者: yuoska 时间: 2011-8-17 08:58
I went Windsor Week, Schweser MP3's, CFAI text, CFAI Mocks and Scwheser Exams (no Schweser notes), 600 hrs of study, AF and a little luck.作者: DoubleDip 时间: 2011-8-17 08:58
jcole21 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You're a beast egal.
Thanks, but if you look at my score (62%) you will be much less impressed. I knew I needed the extra mile to pass this. Many of my friends had to do it twice or more. Fact is none of the people I know face-to-face passed level 3 the first time. This got me scared, so I figured over-studieing is superior to underinvesting and doubling down for a second try.作者: laurab 时间: 2011-8-17 08:58
