Board logo

标题: Mechanics of a structured product - help [打印本页]

作者: Elliotbay    时间: 2011-10-14 18:34     标题: Mechanics of a structured product - help

A friend approached me today to evaluate a structured product offered by his advisor. I am not well versed with SP mechanics so I hope that some of you could perhaps share your insight as to the inner workings of this product. (risks etc)

2 yr term

Choose any 2 stocks that you would not mind owning at 30-40 % discount to current trading levels. If I am not mistaken there is a volatility criterion.

You get paid 1%/month till the end of the the term (2 years) unless the stock trades at pre -determined price (i.e. 30-40% level below current value). In this case, you own the stock and the contract is finished.

I think there is probably more to it but in any case any insight will be helpful.

TIA.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Wednesday, September 21, 2011 at 08:14PM by C3Po.
作者: Valores    时间: 2011-10-14 18:40

So you are selling a 30-40% out of the money put and collecting 1% in premium as long as it isn't exercised.

The main risk is that the underlying stock goes to 0 or thereabouts and you have to fork over a ton of cash to buy it at the "predetermined price"

It's a strategy that has made lots of people money. Most of the time, the equity curves show nice steady gains for a long time and then suddenly drop off to zero or at least some massive drawdowns.

People stay in for a while, thinking, I'm just going to do it for a little bit and then get out, but the thought of free money is just too appetizing until the giant comes back from hunting and Jack has to run away in search of the beanstalk.
作者: Windjammer    时间: 2011-10-14 18:45

Thanks. This makes some sense. Where does the investment firm make it's money. Only from the fee?
作者: dyga    时间: 2011-10-14 18:51

Well there's a management fee, of course. Then there's the possibility that you should be getting a 2% premium for that option if you sold it yourself and they're keeping the difference. Then there's also the possibility that the firm exercises your option when the price goes low, while selling the same option to someone else, thus pocketing whatever time value is left in the option and leaving you with an exercised put option as per the contract.
作者: CFA4Techie    时间: 2011-10-14 18:56

Well there's a management fee, of course. Then there's the possibility that you should be getting a 2% premium for that option if you sold it yourself and they're keeping the difference. Then there's also the possibility that the firm exercises your option when the price goes low, while selling the same option to someone else, thus pocketing whatever time value is left in the option and leaving you with an exercised put option as per the contract.
作者: luda002    时间: 2011-10-14 19:02

@bchadwick. Thanks very much.
作者: ba736    时间: 2011-10-14 19:07

.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, September 22, 2011 at 03:47AM by BangBusDriver.
作者: cfalevel2011    时间: 2011-10-14 19:13

Basically it's a barrier option with some sort of equity swap component fixed to it.

Do you end up owing it if it goes below 40% level or stays above 60% level?

Both trades are possible. In both the cases, they'll make money with fees, volatility, correlation and a swap with someone else if there is some sort of upfront payment which should be there. There must be a volatility criteria, this 1% they are paying is essentially coming from structuring volatility, and 1% is quite high, so there must be something to lever up the trade from your friend's end.

From their side, they'll go long the volatility, and depending on what happens at barrier.. they'll go long/short the correlation as well, they might long/short deep in the money put/call depending on what happens at barrier, and they might as well initiate a total return swap with someone else, and finally they'll keep on constantly delta hedging.
作者: morebeans    时间: 2011-10-14 19:18

Basically it's a barrier option with some sort of equity swap component fixed to it.

Do you end up owing it if it goes below 40% level or stays above 60% level?

Both trades are possible. In both the cases, they'll make money with fees, volatility, correlation and a swap with someone else if there is some sort of upfront payment which should be there. There must be a volatility criteria, this 1% they are paying is essentially coming from structuring volatility, and 1% is quite high, so there must be something to lever up the trade from your friend's end.

From their side, they'll go long the volatility, and depending on what happens at barrier.. they'll go long/short the correlation as well, they might long/short deep in the money put/call depending on what happens at barrier, and they might as well initiate a total return swap with someone else, and finally they'll keep on constantly delta hedging.
作者: AnalystAlan    时间: 2011-10-14 19:24

it should be ATM strike down and in barrier at 30-40% of current price Put option that investor sells within the structured product
作者: himanshumh    时间: 2011-10-14 19:29

BangBusDriver Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Basically it's a barrier option with some sort of
> equity swap component fixed to it.
>
> Do you end up owing it if it goes below 40% level
> or stays above 60% level?
>
> Both trades are possible. In both the cases,
> they'll make money with fees, volatility,
> correlation and a swap with someone else if there
> is some sort of upfront payment which should be
> there. There must be a volatility criteria, this
> 1% they are paying is essentially coming from
> structuring volatility, and 1% is quite high, so
> there must be something to lever up the trade from.

your friend's end.
>
> From their side, they'll go long the volatility,
> and depending on what happens at barrier.. they'll
> go long/short the correlation as well, they might
> long/short deep in the money put/call depending on
> what happens at barrier, and they might as well
> initiate a total return swap with someone else,
> and finally they'll keep on constantly delta
> hedging.

@bangbusdriver. Thanks for your input.

Not quite clear as to how the equity swap would fit into this. Could you elaborate.

If the stock price stays above the barrier then you continue to get paid on a monthly basis. Once it reaches the barrier, the contract is null & void and you end up owning the shares at their lower values.

In terms of money, my friend is not borrowing money to invest. When you refer to structuring volatility, are you referring to the VIX or the vol/co relations of the stocks to each other/vix.

Oh, just one more thing, can this not be achieved by just selling front month puts and pocketing the premium which is higher than the barrier premiums.

Thanks for you help. very helpful and enlightening
作者: tikfed    时间: 2011-10-14 19:41

C3Po Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where does the investment firm make it's money. Only from the fee?

There are sometimes games around how payments/coupons/dividends and compounding/schedules are done - be sure you've taken a close look and understand it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, September 22, 2011 at 09:14AM by LPoulin133.
作者: zephyranalyst    时间: 2011-10-14 19:46

nvm



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at Thursday, September 22, 2011 at 09:30AM by ohai.
作者: ruchita    时间: 2011-10-14 19:52

C3Po Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Where does the investment firm make it's money. Only from the fee?

Is there an upfront payment of the principal, which you get back at expiration? If so, the firm makes money from the interest on that principal. The derivative package that they sell you will generally be less valuable than the interest on the principal. This will be in addition to whatever commissions of fees that they charge.
作者: eerenyuan    时间: 2012-8-23 09:34

这东西里面哪里有barrier? 明明就是个out-of-money的put,稍微复杂一点点的地方估计是这东西是同时卖两个put,但是其中任何一份执行了另外一份就失效------帖子里面没这些写,但我记得有那种产品,为了让卖option的人觉得价格更诱人,故意做出这种介于一份option和两份option之间的东西------因为两个都是价外的,当两只股票的相关性不是特别强的时候,本质上和两份期权没太大差别。由此造成的一种错觉是:只卖了一份期权,却得到了超出一份期权的价格。当然,因为他实际上不是一开始付对价,而是中间支付利息,也可以认为这是一个类似CDS或者保险的东西,1%的东西可以当成是保费。

另外,这东西只算是exotic option吧,结构相对还是简单,离structured product还是有点距离的。




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2