Board logo

标题: CFA on business card - possible violation? [打印本页]

作者: dcfox83    时间: 2011-10-15 07:14     标题: CFA on business card - possible violation?

Hey everyone,

Have a quick question about putting CFA on my business cards. My company recently ordered me new cards, and basically on all of our business cards, our names are in caps and bold, which is fine. But the CFA on the card is in all caps, but in a smaller font, and not bold.

Now 2 things... not only does it look stupid, but is it a violation? I know the reverse is obviously a violation where my name is not in bold, and the letters are, however is putting less emphasis on the letters a violation?

I asked my coordinator to change them anyways, mostly because I think it looks stupid, and want it to be a consistent font, but she said all other charterholders at my company have it this way, and the printer set it up specifically that way to indicate it is a designation.

Any thoughts? Thanks!
作者: morebeans    时间: 2011-10-15 07:20

Not a violation. My e-mail signature is the same and I hate it.
作者: RepoToronto    时间: 2011-10-15 07:25

it would be a violation if it was in a larger font
作者: Colum    时间: 2011-10-15 07:31

builders Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> it would be a violation if it was in a larger font

This
作者: RoastBeef    时间: 2011-10-15 07:36

Does the CFAI offer whistleblower compensation for reporting misuse? I've come across a company that systematically misuses it in their email sigs.
作者: RMontgomery    时间: 2011-10-15 07:42

Thanks guys!

Looks like I'm stuck with it then... oh well, it's not the end of the world.
作者: mp3bu    时间: 2011-10-15 07:47

LPoulin133 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Does the CFAI offer whistleblower compensation for
> reporting misuse? I've come across a company that
> systematically misuses it in their email sigs.


Isn't the inner satisfaction of doing the right thing compensation enough?
作者: kkn006    时间: 2011-10-15 07:53

I would think that blatantly misusing the CFA designation would be harmful to your reputation, even if such behavior is not reported. People who are familiar with the CFA program will think that you're incompetent. People who are unfamiliar with the CFA program will not care either way.
作者: b_sea93    时间: 2011-10-15 07:58

higgmond Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Isn't the inner satisfaction of doing the right thing compensation enough?

Of course it is, for me. I was just asking for a friend, who can't post because (insert made up excuse here).
作者: MiniMe7    时间: 2011-10-15 08:04

LPoulin133 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> higgmond Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Isn't the inner satisfaction of doing the right
> thing compensation enough?
>
> Of course it is, for me. I was just asking for a
> friend, who can't post because (insert made up
> excuse here).

This was a test. You failed.
作者: anish    时间: 2011-10-15 08:09

Haha, darn, I gave it my best shot, do I have to wait until next September to take it again?




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2