| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
Prickett: | “Defining an investor’s strategic asset allocation helps the portfolio manager focus on the investor’s goals with respect to risk and return.” |
Rorrer: | “Results of academic studies show that the overall returns to market timing and security selecting are minimal at best and in many cases do not cover a portfolio’s operating expenses and trading costs.” |
Cloe: | “Since the assets within asset classes tend to have a similar response to macroeconomic changes, the target weights of the portfolio’s chosen asset classes will tend to drive the variability of portfolio returns.” |
| ||
| ||
|
Statement 1: | “A clearly defined strategic asset allocation provides discipline in ensuring that the investor’s portfolio accurately reflects the investor’s desires with respect to risk and return.” |
Statement 2: | “Over the long run, asset classes seem to respond somewhat homogenously to systematic risk factors, which means that tactical asset allocation will tend to explain the majority of the variability of portfolio returns. |
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
Statement 1: | We have seen from the previous charts that adding international securities can increase the returns of a portfolio; however, from the investor’s standpoint, risk may be perceived as higher due to the inclusion of currency, political, and legal risk. |
Statement 2: | The investment committee has decided that some type of alternative investment such as hedge funds should be included in all client portfolios, but the large amounts of capital required and the difficulty of finding information may prevent us from investing in alternative investments in some client portfolios. |
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
Impact on Returns | Impact on Risk |
| ||||
| ||||
|
| ||
| ||
|
Statement 1: | “The downside to the strategic asset allocation process is that if the long-term capital market expectations that formed the basis of the strategic asset allocation change dramatically, the client’s long-term returns are likely to suffer significantly.” |
Statement 2: | “Tactical asset allocation has no role in the formal asset allocation process.” |
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
| ||
| ||
|
Statement 1: | A bank is likely to hold more bonds than an insurance company’s surplus portfolio. |
Statement 2: | An endowment is likely to hold more equities than the portfolio that funds an insurance company’s fixed annuities. |
Statement 3: | An endowment is more likely to hold more emerging market equities than an insurance company’s surplus portfolio. |
Statement 4: | A private foundation is likely to have higher cash needs than a pension fund with a low ratio of retired to active lives. |
| ||
| ||
|
Point 1: | The most common way to implement tactical asset allocation is through a derivative overlay. |
Point 2: | Tactical asset allocation is only performed at the asset class level. |
Point 3: | Tactical asset allocation can only be performed at regular intervals (i.e., monthly or quarterly). |
Point 4: | In order to effectively implement the tactical asset allocation changes, our firm should hire additional personnel so that there will be internal experts on staff. |
| ||
| ||
|
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |