Board logo

标题: Reading 26- LOS f ~ Q32-37 [打印本页]

作者: spaceedu    时间: 2008-5-12 16:50     标题: [2008] Session 6 - Reading 26- LOS f ~ Q32-37

32.ter Jameson, CFA® is an analyst for Continental Corp., a global investment bank. Jameson has been assigned coverage of Wasson Brothers (WB), a large U.S. based conglomerate with many subsidiaries in both the U.S. and abroad. Jameson has completed his review of the firm’s U.S. operations, but his research report is due at the end of the week and he has yet to assess the impact of Wasson’s foreign subsidiaries on his earnings model.

One of WB's wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, Kasamatsu Industries, is based in Japan and manufactures a hugely successful line of trading cards, toys, and other related products. All of Kasamatsu's operations and sales take place in Japan, and the corresponding transactions are denominated in Japanese yen. Additionally, Kasamatsu's books and records are all maintained in yen. WB reports its earnings in U.S. dollars. The history of the exchange rate between the dollar and the yen over the last two years is presented in the following table. Figures are presented in /$.

Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate

December 31, 2002

150

December 31, 2001

130

 

2002 Average

140

2001 Average

120

 

Exchange rate on date that 2002 dividends were paid to Wasson Brothers

145

Exchange rate on date of stock issue and acquisition of fixed assets

100

 

Kasamatsu Industries Financial Data (12/31/02)

 

Yen
(in thousands)

Exchange
Rate

U.S. Dollars
(in thousands)

Sales

700,000

 

 

COGS

280,000

 

 

Depreciation

126,000

 

 

SG & A

77,000

 

 

Income Tax Expense

98,000

 

 

Net Income

119,000

 

 

2001 Retained Earnings

0

 

 

Dividends

58,000

 

 

2002 Retained Earnings

61,000

 

 

Current Assets

50,000

 

 

Fixed Assets

486,000

 

 

Current Liabilities

46,000

 

 

Long Term Debt

254,000

 

 

Capital Stock

175,000

 

 

Accumulated Translation Adjustment

 

 

 

The first step in Jameson’s analysis is to compute Kasamatsu’s impact on WB's net income. What is Kasamatsu’s impact on WB's net income (in thousands dollars)?

A)   $850.

B)   $821.

C)   $793.

D)   $450.


33son now computes the adjustment to WB's financial data due to Kasamatsu's payment of dividends. What is the U.S. dollar amount of this adjustment (in thousands)?

A)   $387.

B)   $414.

C)   $400.

D)   $580.


34 carrying value of Kasamatsu’s total assets on December 31, 2002, using the all-current method of accounting for translations is:

A)   $3,240.

B)   $5,360.

C)   $3,573.

D)   $3,829.


35 yen has depreciated against the dollar in the last year. If the exchange rate in 2001 was in effect during 2002, under the all-current method the reported cost of goods sold would have been:

A)   lower by $333.

B)   higher by $333.

C)   higher by $287.

D)   lower by $287.


36eson has prepared a report assessing the impact of the currency translation on Kasamatsu’s financial ratios. The details of his report are as follows:

§ Quick ratio: higher

§ Total asset turnover: higher

With respect to the direction of changes for the ratios, Jameson is:

A)   incorrect with respect to the quick ratio, and incorrect with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

B)   correct with respect to the quick ratio, and correct with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

C)   incorrect with respect to the quick ratio, but correct with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

D)   correct with respect to the quick ratio, but incorrect with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.


37ving converted all of Kasamatsu’s accounts using the all-current methods, Jameson is curious to compare the difference between the temporal and all-current methods on balance sheet accounts. The difference in translated fixed assets and long term debt respectively if Jameson were to use the temporal method rather than the all-current method is:

Fixed Assets

Long-Term Debt

 

A   $1620                        $0

B   $1620                     $121

C    $0                           $0

D    $0                         $121




作者: spaceedu    时间: 2008-5-12 16:51

32.ter Jameson, CFA® is an analyst for Continental Corp., a global investment bank. Jameson has been assigned coverage of Wasson Brothers (WB), a large U.S. based conglomerate with many subsidiaries in both the U.S. and abroad. Jameson has completed his review of the firm’s U.S. operations, but his research report is due at the end of the week and he has yet to assess the impact of Wasson’s foreign subsidiaries on his earnings model.

One of WB's wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries, Kasamatsu Industries, is based in Japan and manufactures a hugely successful line of trading cards, toys, and other related products. All of Kasamatsu's operations and sales take place in Japan, and the corresponding transactions are denominated in Japanese yen. Additionally, Kasamatsu's books and records are all maintained in yen. WB reports its earnings in U.S. dollars. The history of the exchange rate between the dollar and the yen over the last two years is presented in the following table. Figures are presented in /$.

Yen/Dollar Exchange Rate

December 31, 2002

150

December 31, 2001

130

 

2002 Average

140

2001 Average

120

 

Exchange rate on date that 2002 dividends were paid to Wasson Brothers

145

Exchange rate on date of stock issue and acquisition of fixed assets

100

 

Kasamatsu Industries Financial Data (12/31/02)

 

Yen
(in thousands)

Exchange
Rate

U.S. Dollars
(in thousands)

Sales

700,000

 

 

COGS

280,000

 

 

Depreciation

126,000

 

 

SG & A

77,000

 

 

Income Tax Expense

98,000

 

 

Net Income

119,000

 

 

2001 Retained Earnings

0

 

 

Dividends

58,000

 

 

2002 Retained Earnings

61,000

 

 

Current Assets

50,000

 

 

Fixed Assets

486,000

 

 

Current Liabilities

46,000

 

 

Long Term Debt

254,000

 

 

Capital Stock

175,000

 

 

Accumulated Translation Adjustment

 

 

 

The first step in Jameson’s analysis is to compute Kasamatsu’s impact on WB's net income. What is Kasamatsu’s impact on WB's net income (in thousands dollars)?

A)   $850.

B)   $821.

C)   $793.

D)   $450.

The correct answer was A)

Because Kasamatsu is a wholly owned subsidiary of WB, all of its net income will be included in WB's. Kasamatsu’s local currency is also the functional currency, so the all-current method should be used to translate the financial statements into U.S. dollars. The appropriate exchange rate to use would be the average exchange rate for 2002, and no adjustment needs to be made for the dividend. The calculation is:

119,000/140 = 850

Therefore, WB will report an additional $850,000 of net income as a result of their subsidiary's operating results. The other answers use incorrect exchange rates.

33son now computes the adjustment to WB's financial data due to Kasamatsu's payment of dividends. What is the U.S. dollar amount of this adjustment (in thousands)?

A)   $387.

B)   $414.

C)   $400.

D)   $580.

The correct answer was C)

WB receives a cash dividend from their subsidiary. This dividend must be translated at the prevailing exchange rate on the date the dividend is received, 145/$. 58,000/145 = 400 The other answers use incorrect exchange rates.

34 carrying value of Kasamatsu’s total assets on December 31, 2002, using the all-current method of accounting for translations is:

A)   $3,240.

B)   $5,360.

C)   $3,573.

D)   $3,829.

The correct answer was C)

Under the all-current method, all balance sheet accounts, with the exception of equity, are translated at the current rate. At the current rate of 150 under the all-current method, the amount is. (486,000 + 50,000)/150 = $3,573.

35 yen has depreciated against the dollar in the last year. If the exchange rate in 2001 was in effect during 2002, under the all-current method the reported cost of goods sold would have been:

A)   lower by $333.

B)   higher by $333.

C)   higher by $287.

D)   lower by $287.

The correct answer was B)

Under the all-current method, COGS is translated at the average rate in effect during the reporting period. Using the average exchange rate during 2002, COGS is calculated as 280,000/140 = $2,000. Using the average rate in effect during 2001 results in COGS of $2,333 (280,000/120), or $333 higher.

36eson has prepared a report assessing the impact of the currency translation on Kasamatsu’s financial ratios. The details of his report are as follows:

§ Quick ratio: higher

§ Total asset turnover: higher

With respect to the direction of changes for the ratios, Jameson is:

A)   incorrect with respect to the quick ratio, and incorrect with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

B)   correct with respect to the quick ratio, and correct with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

C)   incorrect with respect to the quick ratio, but correct with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

D)   correct with respect to the quick ratio, but incorrect with respect to the total asset turnover ratio.

The correct answer was C)     

For the quick ratio, both current assets (with the exception of inventory) and current liabilities will be translated at the current rate. The ratio will be unchanged, so Jameson is incorrect with respect to this one.

For the total asset turnover ratio, sales will be translated at the average rate, while assets will be translated at the current rate. Since the currency is depreciating, the rate used to translate sales will be higher than the rate used to translate assets, resulting in a higher total asset turnover ratio. Jameson is correct with respect to the direction of change for this one.

37ving converted all of Kasamatsu’s accounts using the all-current methods, Jameson is curious to compare the difference between the temporal and all-current methods on balance sheet accounts. The difference in translated fixed assets and long term debt respectively if Jameson were to use the temporal method rather than the all-current method is:

Fixed Assets

Long-Term Debt

 

A   $1620            $0

B   $1620                     $121

C    $0               $0

D    $0               $121

The correct answer was A

Fixed assets under the temporal method, are reported at historical translation rates. 486,000/100 = $4,860. Under all-current, fixed assets are translated at the current rate (486,000/150) = $3,240, a difference of $1,620.

Even though it is a balance sheet account, under the temporal method, long term debt is considered a monetary liability and is translated at the current rate. Under the all-current method, long-term debt is also translated at the current rate, so the difference between the two methods is $0.






欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2