Board logo

标题: Reading 55, MBS, Q21 (Pg 421) - CFAI - I'm wondering [打印本页]

作者: pacmandefense    时间: 2013-4-2 11:21     标题: Reading 55, MBS, Q21 (Pg 421) - CFAI - I'm wondering

Question: from the manager of saving&loan association portfolio, which MBS is better:
1. Passthrough security with a WAM of 310 months or
2. PAC tranche CMO with average life = 2years
Answer from book: choice 2 with shorter average life, due to less extension risk.
Why only extension risk?
作者: laurab    时间: 2013-4-2 11:22

PAC Tranche gets scheduled payments only. Any additional payments (prepayments beyond the scheduled principal) - would go to the support tranche.
So it will have less extension risk. And given the structure and the size of support available, it is unlikely to contract as well.
作者: d2rockstar    时间: 2013-4-2 11:22

My thought process.
The question asked which one would probably be better from an ASSET/LIABILITY point of view.
They both have prepayment risk but option ii has lower extension risk.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2