Board logo

标题: Schweser Practice Exam Vol 1 vs. CFAI exams [打印本页]

作者: giorgio10    时间: 2013-4-2 13:29     标题: Schweser Practice Exam Vol 1 vs. CFAI exams

Does anybody else feel like the Schweser exams are poor constructed relative to actual CFAI exams? Especially for the AM sections….
I didn’t score too badly on Exam 2 AM and PM of Schweser but didn’t think I learned alot from it either. Felt like it just asked me to regurgitate definitions vs. actually thinking critically.
作者: RoastBeef    时间: 2013-4-2 13:30

sure schweser AM is rubbish
作者: DoubleDip    时间: 2013-4-2 13:31

schweser is definitely not as well put together. Ive already sent them a few errata emails. still good practice, but sometimes it really annoys me
作者: krause2    时间: 2013-4-2 13:31

I’d agree, I’m not putting in any time on Schweser Vol 2 (I never had in level 1 or 2). From here on in I’m just focusing on reviewing the tests I’ve done and reading up on my weak areas.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2