Board logo

标题: CFAI vol 2 Reading 13 Q1 [打印本页]

作者: yalo    时间: 2013-4-3 21:58     标题: CFAI vol 2 Reading 13 Q1

How come the answer to this one isn’t the ceteris paribus defense? His forecast would have been correct, ceteris paribus. Except the Fed increased rates.
作者: Iginla2010    时间: 2013-4-3 22:01

I marked ceteris paribus as well but the logic seems to be that the Fed instead changed the rates opposite of what analyst had predicted…so if only
ceteris paribus when the Fed would have kept the rates same…




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2