标题: CFA ethics violaters/misconduct list [打印本页] 作者: CPATrader 时间: 2013-4-28 08:58 标题: CFA ethics violaters/misconduct list
Anyone know where I can see this list online?作者: Bad5shah 时间: 2013-4-28 08:58
^ yea I noticed that too. He “failed to answer an inquiry and provide evidence”
I guess that means he didn’t forward his fake offer letter from “Bank Of Ameria”作者: Mechanic 时间: 2013-4-28 08:58
Is it strange that I was sad that I didn’t know anyone on that list?作者: Carson 时间: 2013-4-28 08:59
Anyone see the dude who was done for posting on porn sites with his name and CFA designation. Qutie a good read rather than the other boring ethics/misconduct violations on there.作者: Houjichasan 时间: 2013-4-28 08:59
Gustafsson is there.作者: giorgio10 时间: 2013-4-28 08:59
Legendary….
Additionally, the CFA Institute Professional Conduct Program found unprofessional commentary on internet pornographic chat sites, apparently posted by Mr. Gustafsson, where his name included the CFA designation作者: Benjiko 时间: 2013-4-28 08:59
transferpricingCFA wrote:
Legendary….
Additionally, the CFA Institute Professional Conduct Program found unprofessional commentary on internet pornographic chat sites, apparently posted by Mr. Gustafsson, where his name included the CFA designation
Apparently when they asked to respond to the PCP enquiry he sent them a whole lot of porn and a letter full of expletives.
What a guy……作者: Iginla2010 时间: 2013-4-28 09:00
good read.作者: DarienHacker 时间: 2013-4-28 09:00
how come the guy still continue to use CFA designation on his website?
http://www.nicklasgustafsson.ws/Introduction作者: MiniMe7 时间: 2013-4-28 09:00
Who can stop him? Anyone can use it I’d imagine作者: waldziuchna 时间: 2013-4-28 09:01
this is quite harsh, he must’ve worked so hard for his CFA and one stupid action and his designation goes down the drain.作者: chandsingh 时间: 2013-4-28 09:01
FinancialWar wrote:
how come the guy still continue to use CFA designation on his website?
http://www.nicklasgustafsson.ws/Introduction
So many people are fearful of the all-powerful CFA Institute with all the sanctions and penalities they put on people. But the truth of the matter is: what is their enforcement power?
Will they come to your house and haul you to prison? No.
Can they get the website host to kill off the website? No.
Can they get you charged with a crime? or hell, a misdeameanor? No.
If this guy had his CFA once before, did some violations, but keeps putting CFA behind his name, there’s nothing CFAI can do about it except complain about it with a letter and post it on their website that he’s in violation.
If the guy isn’t doing finance related work, I doubt CFAI will pursue him作者: xilinx_altera 时间: 2013-4-28 09:02
Quote:Can they get you charged with a crime? or hell, a misdeameanor? No …//
1. Misdemeanors are crimes.
2. He can be arrested for fraud if any client discovers that he presented himself as having a professional designation that he doesn’t.作者: maratikus 时间: 2013-4-28 09:02
aaronhotchner wrote:
Quote:Can they get you charged with a crime? or hell, a misdeameanor? No …//
1. Misdemeanors are crimes.
2. He can be arrested for fraud if any client discovers that he presented himself as having a professional designation that he doesn’t.
Yeah, though I seriously doubt whether this dude has any clients. If he does, they’re even bigger muppets than Goldman’s clients.作者: ayodayo 时间: 2013-4-28 09:02
well guess what, the guy’s violation was back in 2006. He clearly hasn’t been arrested. And oh look, the website still has CFA behind his name.作者: SeanWest 时间: 2013-4-28 09:02
When you say Goldman do you mean Goldman Sachs? If so, can you clarify why they are muppets?作者: BelalM 时间: 2013-4-28 09:03
FinancialWar wrote:
When you say Goldman do you mean Goldman Sachs? If so, can you clarify why they are muppets?
I’m not really saying they’re muppets, Greg Smith did that. Hopefully you know what I’m talking about, there’s plenty of threads in the Watercooler on his outburst. My comment was a joke.作者: grharmeyer 时间: 2013-4-28 09:03
FinancialWar wrote:
When you say Goldman do you mean Goldman Sachs? If so, can you clarify why they are muppets?
Do you watch the news? It’s all over the finance blogs, wsj, bloomberg….
