All of the following are reasons investors should consider constructing global portfolios EXCEPT:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Increased foreign exchange risk is the cost of going global. In terms of the home currency (which could be the USD or other currency) including assets denominated in foreign currencies can increase portfolio volatility. This is a particular concern when the foreign currencies depreciate against the home currency.
According to a study on bond returns during the period 1987-1996, the U.S. dollar generally weakened relative to the other countries in the study (specifically, Canada, Euro area, Japan and the U.K.). Which of the following statements regarding the impact of exchange rates on security returns is TRUE?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
When the home currency is weakening, the investor should invest more in foreign bonds. As the dollar weakens, a U.S. investor will earn a higher return on foreign investments because each foreign currency unit buys more dollars.
While in the managerial training program for a large multinational financial services corporation, Galaxi, Inc. (Galaxi), Daniel Waite is assigned to a one-year rotation in the Mediterranean division. Upon arriving at his assignment, Waite purchases a local (foreign currency) bond with an annual coupon of 8.5 percent for 96.5.
One of Waites clients asks him to create a concentrated, two asset portfolio consisting of one European stock and one U.S. stock. Pertinent information on the two stocks and the portfolio is given below:
After completing his training program in the Mediterranean division, it is now time to return to the U.S. Waite sells the bond he purchased when he arrived (a one year holding period) for 98.0. Waite is pleased with his return, which he calculates at 10.4 percent.
On the plane ride home, Waite sits next to his co-worker, Penny King. Waite and King naturally begin to chat about their experience abroad. King brings up the depressed economic conditions in the Mediterranean and the negative returns she experienced on her local bond investments. She states that her total dollar return on an 8.0 percent annual coupon bond purchased at the same time as Waite's for 95.0 and sold for 98.0 (at the same time as Waite's) was a disappointing negative 10.74 percent.
Waite and King turn their discussion to international investing in general. They agree that, despite the increased integration of world markets, investors can benefit from global investing.
Equity market correlations continue to be low due to a number of factors, comments King. There are so many differences in cultural mores, technology, government regulations, and monetary policy that most national economies still move independently of one another. International diversification works.
I dont think thats entirely true responds Waite. If you look at countries like the G-7, with similar government regulations, fiscal philosophies, and monetary policies, then there really isnt much diversification effect. The correlations arent low enough. You have to be quite selective about which foreign markets you get into. Then diversification can really pay off.
At their layover stop in London, Waite and King unexpectedly meet another colleague from work, Miko Katori. Katori just completed a two year term in Galaxis Tokyo office and has been assigned to London. At lunch Katori tells King and Waite about some of the assignments she worked on during the past two years. She is particularly excited about her personal research. I did a fascinating study using twenty years of bond data and discovered that the correlations between international bond markets can be lower than the correlation between international stock markets. From this I concluded that adding international bonds to a portfolio will reduce risk but not increase return due to the lower returns on bonds compared to equities
Assume that Kings calculation is correct and that Waite made a calculation error. Which of the following is closest to Waites actual total dollar return?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Waite forgot to take into account the impact of the percentage change in the dollar value of the foreign currency. Using the information provided by King, we can determine the percentage change in the value of the foreign currency and then calculate Waite's total dollar return. Use the formula for total dollar return: This may be calculated as: R$ = RLC + S + RLCS where: Return on Kings bond = (8.0 + 98.0 95.0) / 95.0 = 0.115789 Solving for S we get: R$ King = 0.115789 + S + 0.115789S S = -0.20 or 20.0% depreciation of the foreign currency. Now, Waites total dollar return can be computed. Return on Waites bond in the local currency = (8.5 + 98.0 - 96.5) / 96.5 = 0.103627 R$ Waite = 0.103627 0.20 + (.1036)(-0.20) = 0.103627 - 0.20 - 0.02072 = -0.117 or -11.7%
R$ = Return on foreign asset in U.S. dollar terms
RLC = Return on foreign asset in local currency terms
S = Percentage change in foreign currency
-0.1074 = 0.115789 + 1.115789S
-0.22319 = 1.115789S
Waite forgot to take into account the impact of the percentage change in the dollar value of the foreign currency. Using the information provided by King, we can determine the percentage change in the value of the foreign currency and then calculate Waite's total dollar return. Use the formula for total dollar return:
This may be calculated as:
R$ = RLC + S + RLCS
where:
R$ = Return on foreign asset in U.S. dollar terms
RLC = Return on foreign asset in local currency terms
S = Percentage change in foreign currencyReturn on Kings bond = (8.0 + 98.0 95.0) / 95.0 = 0.115789
Solving for S we get:
R$ King = 0.115789 + S + 0.115789S
-0.1074 = 0.115789 + 1.115789S
-0.22319 = 1.115789SS = -0.20 or 20.0% depreciation of the foreign currency.
Now, Waites total dollar return can be computed.
Return on Waites bond in the local currency = (8.5 + 98.0 - 96.5) / 96.5 = 0.103627
R$ Waite = 0.103627 0.20 + (.1036)(-0.20)
= 0.103627 - 0.20 - 0.02072 = -0.117 or -11.7%
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Even among countries with similar government regulations, fiscal policies, and monetary policies, such as the G-7 countries, the correlations can be sufficiently low to offer diversification opportunities.
Lower Correlation of Bonds | Lower Return of Adding Bonds |
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
International bond market correlations can be lower than international equity markets due to differing government fiscal and monetary policies. Thus adding international bonds to a global portfolio offers opportunities for lower risk and higher return.
International bond market correlations can be lower than international equity markets due to differing government fiscal and monetary policies. Thus adding international bonds to a global portfolio offers opportunities for lower risk and higher return.
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
In an attempt to keep capital in their countries, many governments of developing economies place restrictions on the repatriation of capital and profits. Other methods that a developing country may use to maintain control of its market include:
In an attempt to keep capital in their countries, many governments of developing economies place restrictions on the repatriation of capital and profits. Other methods that a developing country may use to maintain control of its market include:
Standard Deviation Expected Return
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
σ2port = w2u.s.σ2u.s. + w2eσ2e + 2wu.s.weσu.s.σe ρu.s.,e σ2port = (.7)2(.23)2 + (.3)2(.37)2 + (2)(.7)(.3)(.23)(.37)(.6) σ2port = 0.0596872 σ= √σ2port = √.0596872 = .2443096 = 24.431% Expect return = wu.s.E(Ru.s.) + weE(Re) = (.7)(.10) + (.3)(.12) = 10.6%
σ2port = w2u.s.σ2u.s. + w2eσ2e + 2wu.s.weσu.s.σe ρu.s.,e
σ2port = (.7)2(.23)2 + (.3)2(.37)2 + (2)(.7)(.3)(.23)(.37)(.6)
σ2port = 0.0596872
σ= √σ2port = √.0596872 = .2443096 = 24.431%
Expect return = wu.s.E(Ru.s.) + weE(Re)
= (.7)(.10) + (.3)(.12) = 10.6%
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Having a leptokurtic distribution means that the probability of large positive and large negative returns is greater than under a normal distribution. If large negative events occur more frequently than assumed by mean-variance analysis, the case for global diversification is weakened. One of the primary arguments against international diversification is that global markets are becoming integrated and the mobility of capital has increased. The problem with estimating correlation during periods of rising volatility is that the correlation will be biased upwards when in fact it has not changed. Therefore, an argument against international diversification may not be valid if it relies on correlations calculated during volatile periods. The contribution of currency risk only slightly magnifies the volatility of foreign investments. Studies show that currency risk is about 50% of the foreign stock risk in local currency terms. Moreover, asset and currency risk are not additive, and in many instances currency risk can be hedged or diversified away in an international portfolio.
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
What is the expected return of the portfolio?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
To obtain the return in domestic currency terms use the following formula that considers the return in local currency terms as well as the exchange rate change:
-.12 - .06 + (-.12 * -.06) = -.1728 or -17.28%
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
The gain on the stock in foreign currency terms was 15 percent.
The foreign currency has depreciated by 8 percent.
The standard deviation of stock returns was 35 percent and the standard deviation of the foreign currency was 11 percent.
The correlation between the stock returns and the currency is 0.10.
What is the expected return of the portfolio?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
To obtain the return in domestic currency terms use the following formula that considers the return in local currency terms as well as the exchange rate change: 15% - 8% + (15% * - 8%) = 5.80%
15% - 8% + (15% * - 8%) = 5.80%
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
The gain on the stock in foreign currency terms was 22 percent.
The foreign currency has appreciated by 7 percent.
The standard deviation of stock returns was 38 percent and the standard deviation of the foreign currency was 24 percent.
The correlation between the stock returns and the currency is 0.10.
What is the expected return of the portfolio?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
To obtain the return in domestic currency terms use the following formula that considers the return in local currency terms as well as the exchange rate change:
22% + 7% + (22% * 7%) = 30.54%
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
What is the risk of the portfolio in U.S. dollar terms as measured by the standard deviation?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
We will use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two: σ$2 = 0.332 + 0.142 + 2(0.33)(0.14)(0.2) = 0.1470 σ$ = √0.1470 = 0.3834 = 38.34%
We will use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two:
σ$2 = 0.332 + 0.142 + 2(0.33)(0.14)(0.2) = 0.1470
σ$ = √0.1470 = 0.3834 = 38.34%
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
The gain on the stock in foreign currency terms was 15 percent.
The foreign currency has depreciated by 8 percent.
The standard deviation of stock returns was 35 percent and the standard deviation of the foreign currency was 11 percent.
The correlation between the stock returns and the currency is 0.10.
What is the contribution of currency risk?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
The contribution of currency risk measures the risk incremental to foreign asset risk from currency risk and is the difference between the asset risk in domestic currency terms and the risk of the foreign asset in foreign currency terms. To obtain the contribution of currency risk, we must first calculate the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms. To obtain the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms, we use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two: σ$2 = 0.352 + 0.112 + 2(0.35)(0.11)(0.1) = 0.1423 σ$ = √0.1423 = 0.3772 = 37.72% Contribution of Currency = 37.72% - 35.00% = 2.72%
The contribution of currency risk measures the risk incremental to foreign asset risk from currency risk and is the difference between the asset risk in domestic currency terms and the risk of the foreign asset in foreign currency terms. To obtain the contribution of currency risk, we must first calculate the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms. To obtain the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms, we use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two:
σ$2 = 0.352 + 0.112 + 2(0.35)(0.11)(0.1) = 0.1423
σ$ = √0.1423 = 0.3772 = 37.72%
Contribution of Currency = 37.72% - 35.00% = 2.72%
The following data applies to a foreign stock investment:
The gain on the stock in foreign currency terms was 22 percent.
The foreign currency has appreciated by 7 percent.
The standard deviation of stock returns was 38 percent and the standard deviation of the foreign currency was 24 percent.
The correlation between the stock returns and the currency is 0.10.
What is the contribution of currency risk?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
The contribution of currency risk measures the risk incremental to foreign asset risk from currency risk and is the difference between the asset risk in domestic currency terms and the risk of the foreign asset in foreign currency terms. To obtain the contribution of currency risk, we must first calculate the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms. To obtain the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms, we use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two: σ$2 = 0.382 + 0.242 + 2(0.38)(0.24)(0.1) = 0.2202 σ$ = √0.2202 = 0.4693 = 46.93% Contribution of Currency = 46.93% - 38.00% = 8.93%
The contribution of currency risk measures the risk incremental to foreign asset risk from currency risk and is the difference between the asset risk in domestic currency terms and the risk of the foreign asset in foreign currency terms. To obtain the contribution of currency risk, we must first calculate the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms. To obtain the risk of the asset in domestic currency terms, we use the formula for portfolio risk that considers the risk of the asset in foreign currency terms, the risk of the foreign currency, and the correlation between the two:
σ$2 = 0.382 + 0.242 + 2(0.38)(0.24)(0.1) = 0.2202
σ$ = √0.2202 = 0.4693 = 46.93%
Contribution of Currency = 46.93% - 38.00% = 8.93%
Which of the following statements concerning currency risk is most accurate? Currency risk:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Currency risk only slightly magnifies the risk of foreign investments because it is only about half that of foreign stock risk on average and much of it can be diversified away in a portfolio of currencies. Also foreign currency risk and foreign asset risk are not additive due to correlations between them of less than one.
Which of the following statements regarding foreign currency risk is FALSE? Foreign currency risk:
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
Foreign currency risk is only about half that of foreign stock risk on average. It is about twice that of foreign bond risk however. Much of it can be diversified away in a portfolio of currencies and can be hedged with derivative instruments.
Which of the following statements regarding international diversification is least accurate?
| ||
| ||
| ||
|
A depreciating foreign currency harms the international investor by resulting in a lower home currency return. Foreign currency risk and foreign asset risk are not additive because the correlations between them are usually quite low, and sometimes negative. Foreign currency risk also helps diversify domestic fiscal and monetary policies.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |