Board logo

标题: Difference between Sharpe's ratio, Treynor's ratio and Jense [打印本页]

作者: EastCoastJ    时间: 2013-8-9 09:36     标题: Difference between Sharpe's ratio, Treynor's ratio and Jense

I’m kinda getting confused between the three. From what I gather, Sharpe’s measures excess return on risky portfolios. Treynor’s measures excess return compared to riskless portfolios. And Jensen’s measures excess returns over CAPM and portfolio beta. Is this correct? If not can someone please simplify these three for me.
作者: Analyze_This    时间: 2013-8-9 09:36

From what i gather…
Sharpe measures excess return over total risk (std dev of portfolio)
Treynor mesaures excess return over market (beta)
Jensens Alpha measures excess over CAPM expected return
作者: hoangvu90    时间: 2013-8-9 09:36

Remember: Treynor’s only appropriate for well-diversified portfolios.
作者: bchadwick    时间: 2013-8-9 09:37

Sharpe & M2 = Total Risk
Treynor & Jensens = Systematic Risk
作者: dvilayphet    时间: 2013-8-9 09:37

“Correct me if I am wrong but I believe you have this backwards. I was under the impression that systematic risk (beta) cannot be diversified away but non-systematic risk can be diversified away?”
You are correct.
作者: AndyNZ    时间: 2013-8-9 09:37

Beta is the porfolio’s COV(a,b)/market standard deviation
Doesn’t that mean B is non-systematic risk?  If the market falls by 100, and you have a B of 1, your portfolio will fall by 100.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2