Board logo

标题: 2013 CFA Level II reviews [打印本页]

作者: hinsafdar    时间: 2013-8-12 22:07     标题: 2013 CFA Level II reviews

Ladies and gentlemen how did it go?
作者: soverby    时间: 2013-8-12 22:10

Good test, good test -  bravo!
作者: former    时间: 2013-8-12 22:13

I know I failed band 10, that is all.  I am miserable and stressing already.
作者: tango_gs    时间: 2013-8-12 22:18

Band 9 or 10 coming my way.
作者: RoastBeef    时间: 2013-8-12 22:21

Wct2010, why?
作者: sabre    时间: 2013-8-12 22:26

relatively pretty good
morning section nailed it
afternoon session was exhausting, poor sleep the night before
作者: DarienHacker    时间: 2013-8-12 22:28

it was such a joyous moment getting to that last answer column on the PM section, knowing that I was only a handful of questions to go before it was all over.
I finished PM with about 15 minutes to go.  I had marked about 7 questions to go over but just didn’t have the energy to look at them again.  I just put my pencil down and switched off mentally.
作者: Analti_Calte    时间: 2013-8-12 22:31

I thought it was kind of easy. I talked to people in which this was their third go at L2 and they said this one was much easier than last two. I predict 47-50% pass rate.
作者: canadiananalyst    时间: 2013-8-12 22:36

extremely well crafted exam, I feel like they test everything in the syllabus, am session is slightly more difficult than pm session so that exhausted candidates can feel a bit released
作者: yodacaia    时间: 2013-8-12 22:39

This exam seemed easier than last year – although thinking back I already know I made a few mistakes.
I feel that I’m borderline this year.
作者: KungFuPanda    时间: 2013-8-12 22:41

To those above who are saying they think they are going to fail band 9 or 10 - what percentage of questions do they think they got right/wrong?
作者: PieMan    时间: 2013-8-12 22:44

As I heard easier exam will be harder to pass I do not know how this year result maybe, this one is very reasonable compared to past years
作者: OmarAdnan    时间: 2013-8-12 22:47

I don’t know why the consensus was it was easy.  It kinda came out of left field for me.  I think I passed around low 70’s but it’s possible I scored mid-60’s and failed.
I didn’t feel it was very representitive of the curriculum in regards to the smaller weighted topics.  So many questions had tricks to them.
I ended up having to take complete guesses on about 8 questions or so.
作者: lunarfollies    时间: 2013-8-12 22:52

It was not too bad, FRA and equity in particular were pretty smooth compared to what they could have been.  Overall though, I’m not sure if I made it, I got a feeling the MPS will be relatively high on this one and I am doubting I scored > 70%.
Overall I found PM easier than AM.
作者: pawn    时间: 2013-8-12 22:55

Morning easier, afternoon more challenging. Part of it fatigue based for me.
Exam was definitely easier than the mock or the Schweisers, was more straightforward and easier to read.
There were a few gaps which Schweiser notes didn’t address that the exam hit on (and having checked the curriculum was in there), but overall Schweiser was okay for prep purposes.
Have no idea if I passed, was losing steam toward the end, but don’t feel bad about it.
作者: Analti_Calte    时间: 2013-8-12 22:57

I asked around my friends and everyone is confident that they score above 70%, this is a huge contrast to last year when everyone is so sure they gonna fail, I hope CFAI will keep to their promise that noone ever fails with >70% score otherwise it will be very very unfair
作者: joehogue    时间: 2013-8-12 23:00

what I have to say is how poorly the empty space was used for the bubbling area. Only about half of it was used for both the AM and PM sections and erasing was made more difficult because of this. Anyone felt this too? haha
As far as passing, it shall depend on the MPS.
作者: yalo    时间: 2013-8-12 23:05

1) it’s making me nervous everyone thought the exam was relatively easy. I felt this way too, and so did the people I took the exam with. This is NOT good for the curve, am i right?
2) Portfolio Management was a killer at the end, no?
3) I think CFAI looks at schweser and likes to test what they left out.
作者: cfa10yrplan    时间: 2013-8-12 23:08

just beating myself up because I missed a few questions in the afternoon that I can do in my sleep, total brain farts.  2 hours sleep the night before killed me I guess.
作者: Andreas42    时间: 2013-8-12 23:18

I thought PM was tougher than AM. Ethics was toughest for me but maybe I just didn’t spend enough time on it. I feel like I broke 70 but wouldn’t be completely shocked if I didn’t pass. Waiting game begins…
作者: tarunajwani    时间: 2013-8-12 23:21

I think the test is a give away if one does the EOC and read the CFAI books, Schweser really needs to alight to CFAI curriculum, they deviate too much. I learnt the lesson from past years of not paying enough attention to the CFAI books
作者: hw0799    时间: 2013-8-12 23:26

I found the afternoon session a level or two harder than the morning session.   I am confident I passed if this were a college exam.  What I’m concerned about with the CFA is whether there were tons of tricks/nuances that I didn’t pick up that will make my seemingly right answer wrong.
On a side note, does the CFA have to follow the LOS exactly?   There was a problem that required a formula where calculate was clearly not in the LOS and Schweser said that calculating was taken out of the LOS in the past year or two.




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2