Board logo

标题: Reading 3: CFA Institute Soft Dollar Standards - LOS b - Q [打印本页]

作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-7 11:15     标题: [2009] Session 1 - Reading 3: CFA Institute Soft Dollar Standards - LOS b - Q

Q19. The method that Nagle uses to allocate the IPO issues to his clients is:

A)   a violation of the standards on fair dealing.

B)   not a violation of the standards because Nagle discloses the practice to his clients.

C)   a violation of the standard on soft dollars.

Q20. Nagle’s standing order to purchase as much as much as possible of each Presley Brothers’ IPOs is a violation of the standard because:

A)   Nagle should get advanced notice of his clients’ interest in the IPO.

B)   Nagle is, in effect, distributing soft dollars.

C)   of no reason, it is actually an acceptable practice because all the IPOs have been profitable.

Q21. Nagle has violated the standards on research objectivity by:

A)   his standing order for IPOs but not by his using only Presley Brothers investment products.

B)   his only using Presley Brothers investment products but not by his standing order for IPOs.

C)   his standing order for IPOs and his using only Presley Brothers investment products.

Q22. With respect to the trip that Nagle has been taking each year Nagle:

A)   should disclose it to his clients because it could represent a conflict of interest and hinder his objectivity.

B)   should disclose it to his clients because it provides him with information about stock market activities other than those of Presley Brothers.

C)   does not need to disclose it to his clients because it provides him with valuable information.

Q23. Being able to offer his clients discount commissions on option trades after generating a certain amount of commissions is:

A)   not a violation because it is a benefit that all clients can share in if they so choose.

B)   a violation because commissions on option trades are the quintessential soft dollars.

C)   a violation because it benefits those clients who are inclined to do option trading.


作者: mayanfang1    时间: 2009-1-7 11:15

答案和详解如下:

Q19. The method that Nagle uses to allocate the IPO issues to his clients is:

A)   a violation of the standards on fair dealing.

B)   not a violation of the standards because Nagle discloses the practice to his clients.

C)   a violation of the standard on soft dollars.

Correct answer is A)

Nagle needs to give all of his clients an opportunity to participate in profitable deals. In Nagle’s current system, it is possible for long-time clients who generate a consistent level of business per year to never be able to participate in a profitable IPO.

Q20. Nagle’s standing order to purchase as much as much as possible of each Presley Brothers’ IPOs is a violation of the standard because:

A)   Nagle should get advanced notice of his clients’ interest in the IPO.

B)   Nagle is, in effect, distributing soft dollars.

C)   of no reason, it is actually an acceptable practice because all the IPOs have been profitable.

Correct answer is A)

The standard on Trade Allocation: Fair Dealing and Disclosure requires that Nagle get an advanced indication of client interest.

Q21. Nagle has violated the standards on research objectivity by:

A)   his standing order for IPOs but not by his using only Presley Brothers investment products.

B)   his only using Presley Brothers investment products but not by his standing order for IPOs.

C)   his standing order for IPOs and his using only Presley Brothers investment products.

Correct answer is C)

Nagle is not doing any research on the IPOs before taking the allocations. Apparently, taking the trips has led to Nagle limiting his choices of possible products for his clients. Nagle needs to be more thorough in researching the needs of his clients.

Q22. With respect to the trip that Nagle has been taking each year Nagle:

A)   should disclose it to his clients because it could represent a conflict of interest and hinder his objectivity.

B)   should disclose it to his clients because it provides him with information about stock market activities other than those of Presley Brothers.

C)   does not need to disclose it to his clients because it provides him with valuable information.

Correct answer is A)

Nagle’s objectivity has clearly been compromised since he has started only using Presley Brothers’ products. The clients need to be aware that a significant portion of Nagle’s information is coming from the one firm that executes his trades and provides all of his clients’ products.

Q23. Being able to offer his clients discount commissions on option trades after generating a certain amount of commissions is:

A)   not a violation because it is a benefit that all clients can share in if they so choose.

B)   a violation because commissions on option trades are the quintessential soft dollars.

C)   a violation because it benefits those clients who are inclined to do option trading.

Correct answer is C)

Clearly some of Nagle’s clients will benefit from this arrangement more than others.


作者: cyyap1011    时间: 2009-3-2 13:24

thanks
作者: luck    时间: 2009-3-9 09:41

thx
作者: lenny_chen    时间: 2009-3-19 15:46

x
作者: fujiaqi    时间: 2009-3-29 16:50

1
作者: CFA6077653    时间: 2009-4-1 14:50

BABAC
作者: nopq303    时间: 2009-4-1 21:08     标题: 来顶楼主了支持一下呵呵

群主帖子不错 支持顶一下呵呵



www.sf996.com英雄合击私服
www.ssiyi.cnDNF地下城与勇士外挂
www.758600.cn赤壁外挂
www.zhongxinsf.cn剑侠世界外挂
www.longcheng666.cnAion外挂
作者: dandinghe4748    时间: 2009-4-14 16:50

3x
作者: 虫虫飞    时间: 2009-5-2 02:27

thanks

 


作者: LegendL    时间: 2009-5-17 10:56

thx
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-6-3 00:53

x
作者: hkgee    时间: 2009-6-3 01:01

z
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-6-3 08:17

 thx
作者: saifudan    时间: 2009-6-3 08:17

 thx
作者: puiventi    时间: 2009-6-3 11:32

re
作者: saint_zhu    时间: 2009-8-20 10:40

fiduciary duty
作者: hartzhou    时间: 2009-9-18 17:51

thanks


作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-16 13:54

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩
作者: kungfu1979    时间: 2010-1-6 12:40     标题: good

good
作者: yan_superman    时间: 2010-1-19 10:28

谢谢
作者: mcdullpong    时间: 2010-2-15 23:06

  thks
作者: htpeng    时间: 2010-3-5 08:47

哈哈
作者: tomathome    时间: 2010-5-8 09:02

see
作者: xiamity    时间: 2010-5-16 21:12

thanks
作者: cfa_09    时间: 2010-5-17 09:55

thx
作者: suodi    时间: 2010-5-18 17:04

[em50]
作者: beetal    时间: 2010-5-24 13:26

tv
作者: fissure    时间: 2010-5-29 16:13

see
作者: mewoder    时间: 2010-5-30 15:42

谢谢
作者: wendyshure    时间: 2010-6-1 21:59

傻人
作者: powerhql    时间: 2010-6-2 20:52

Thanks for providing it!
作者: wxl850820    时间: 2010-6-8 19:51

thx

 


作者: milon123    时间: 2011-6-6 03:01

kan kna as ds ds




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2