Q1. Patricia Spraetz is the chief financial officer and compliance officer at Super Selection Investment Advisors.  Super Selection is a medium-sized money management firm which has incorporated the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice into the firm's compliance manual.

Karen Jackson is a portfolio manager for Super Selection.  She is not a CFA charterholder.  Jackson is friendly with David James, president of AMD, a rapidly growing biotech company.  James has provided Jackson with recommendations in the biotech industry, which she buys for her own portfolio before buying them for her clients.  For three years, Jackson has also served on AMD's board of directors.  She has received options and fees as compensation.

Recently, the board of AMD decided to raise capital by voting to issue shares to the public.  This was attractive to board members (including Jackson) who wanted to exercise their stock options and sell their shares to get cash.  When the demand for initial public offerings (IPO) diminished, just before AMD's public offering, James asked Jackson to commit to a large purchase of the offering for her portfolios.  Jackson had previously determined that AMD was a questionable investment but agreed to reconsider at James' request.  Her reevaluation confirmed the stock to be overpriced, but she nevertheless decided to purchase AMD for her clients' portfolios.

Which of the following actions are most appropriate for Spraetz?

A)   Spraetz, as the chief compliance officer, must set company policy in clear terms and monitor the actions of the employees.  In case of violations, she should investigate thoroughly, initiate disciplinary action, and issue guidelines that must be followed in order to prevent future violations.  She must not only detect violations through a continuous monitoring process but also provide guidance for proper conduct consistent with the firm's policy manual.

B)   If, after her investigation Spraetz finds that Jackson has committed violations, Spraetz must report them to senior management and seek legal counsel for possible legal and regulatory implications.  If the upper management does not follow through and take action, Spraetz has fulfilled her supervisory duties and need not take any further action.

C)   Even though Spraetz does not supervise Jackson, as the compliance officer of the firm she is responsible for identifying violations.  Spraetz is not responsible for preventing them and should not go beyond their documentation for senior management.  Thus, she should record the violations but need not take any further action.

答案和详解如下：

Q1. Patricia Spraetz is the chief financial officer and compliance officer at Super Selection Investment Advisors.  Super Selection is a medium-sized money management firm which has incorporated the CFA Institute Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice into the firm's compliance manual.

Karen Jackson is a portfolio manager for Super Selection.  She is not a CFA charterholder.  Jackson is friendly with David James, president of AMD, a rapidly growing biotech company.  James has provided Jackson with recommendations in the biotech industry, which she buys for her own portfolio before buying them for her clients.  For three years, Jackson has also served on AMD's board of directors.  She has received options and fees as compensation.

Recently, the board of AMD decided to raise capital by voting to issue shares to the public.  This was attractive to board members (including Jackson) who wanted to exercise their stock options and sell their shares to get cash.  When the demand for initial public offerings (IPO) diminished, just before AMD's public offering, James asked Jackson to commit to a large purchase of the offering for her portfolios.  Jackson had previously determined that AMD was a questionable investment but agreed to reconsider at James' request.  Her reevaluation confirmed the stock to be overpriced, but she nevertheless decided to purchase AMD for her clients' portfolios.

Which of the following actions are most appropriate for Spraetz?

A)   Spraetz, as the chief compliance officer, must set company policy in clear terms and monitor the actions of the employees.  In case of violations, she should investigate thoroughly, initiate disciplinary action, and issue guidelines that must be followed in order to prevent future violations.  She must not only detect violations through a continuous monitoring process but also provide guidance for proper conduct consistent with the firm's policy manual.

B)   If, after her investigation Spraetz finds that Jackson has committed violations, Spraetz must report them to senior management and seek legal counsel for possible legal and regulatory implications.  If the upper management does not follow through and take action, Spraetz has fulfilled her supervisory duties and need not take any further action.

C)   Even though Spraetz does not supervise Jackson, as the compliance officer of the firm she is responsible for identifying violations.  Spraetz is not responsible for preventing them and should not go beyond their documentation for senior management.  Thus, she should record the violations but need not take any further action.

Correct answer is A)

Since Spraetz has the authority to hire, fire, reward, and punish Jackson, Spraetz has supervisory duties in addition to being the chief compliance officer of Superior Selection. She must investigate Jackson and report her findings to her superiors and possibly the board. If no action is taken, Spraetz must consider resigning under the CFA Institute Code and Standards. Spraetz is also responsible for setting the policy, preventing and detecting violations, and putting into place reasonable procedures to monitor employees' actions. Her role as the chief compliance officer requires her to take disciplinary actions in order to deter further violations.

thanks