CFA论坛 - Powered by Discuz! Board

标题: Reading 19: Life-Cycle Investing －LOS a~Q3 [打印本页]

作者: mayanfang1 时间: 2009-1-20 09:58 标题: [2009] Session 4: Reading 19: Life-Cycle Investing －LOS a~Q3

Q3. Jay, aged 30, is not wealthy. Kevin, aged 50, has significant net worth. Lee, aged 70, is independently wealthy. Which of the following relationships regarding their optimal investment policies is most accurate?

A) Lee should be more aggressive than Kevin, who should be more aggressive than Jay.

B) Kevin should be more aggressive than Jay, who should be more aggressive than Lee.

C) Jay should be more aggressive than Kevin, who should be more aggressive than Lee.

作者: mayanfang1 时间: 2009-1-20 09:59

答案和详解如下：

A) Lee should be more aggressive than Kevin, who should be more aggressive than Jay.

B) Kevin should be more aggressive than Jay, who should be more aggressive than Lee.

C) Jay should be more aggressive than Kevin, who should be more aggressive than Lee.

Correct answer is A)

Even though Lee is older than Kevin, who is older than Jay, wealth dominates age for these investors. Lee is independently wealthy, thus implying that he can be aggressive. Kevin should adopt a moderate risk profile, while Jay should adopt a conservative risk profile.

作者: pundit 时间: 2009-4-23 19:32

a

作者: miguelliu 时间: 2009-4-23 22:40

thx

作者: zhouyp1982 时间: 2009-5-3 12:29

 r

作者: mashanghao 时间: 2009-5-26 15:27 标题: 回复：（mayanfang1）[2009] Session 4: Reading 19: ...

v

作者: eshen 时间: 2009-5-27 09:33

re

作者: sszzyyll 时间: 2009-5-28 22:26

 d

作者: rc2008 时间: 2009-5-28 22:42

d

作者: dandinghe4748 时间: 2009-11-12 13:34

ok

作者: jrxx999 时间: 2009-12-29 13:03

踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩踩

作者: 1212jo 时间: 2010-1-3 14:31

V

作者: szg333 时间: 2010-1-13 16:28

g

作者: leeyaoxee 时间: 2010-5-2 09:48 标题: 回复：（mayanfang1）[2009] Session 4: Reading 19: ...

Thanks.

作者: 思霖 时间: 2010-9-26 16:18

Thank you!

作者: maxsimax 时间: 2011-4-24 16:05

tq

作者: deqiang 时间: 2011-5-21 23:11

thanks.

作者: ghij461 时间: 2011-5-23 21:42 标题: [视频]真人真事真证据，揭露道县政府国土局一场荒唐与丑陋的事实。

2001年我在湖南省道县富塘渔场买了一宗土地，11年来湖南省道县国土局一直未发国土证给我。但是与我同时期，以同样方式买地的人，道县国土局却办理了国土证，有的已建房入住已多年。

请大家看视频与证据。

搜狐视频

Flash: http://share.vrs.sohu.com/my/v.swf&id=6071609&skinNum=2&topBar=1

   新浪视频 [flash]http://you.video.sina.com.cn/api/sinawebApi/outplayrefer.php/vid=51796958_2122202043_P0u0SSE8C2HK+l1lHz2stqkP7KQNt6nniGi2uVKmJQpaQ0/XM5GcY9oO5iDTCNkEqDhAQZk4fPgv0hU/s.swf
[/flash]

   如看不了，请进天涯论坛 http://www.tianya.cn/techforum/content/828/1/188712.shtml

   对于法院的一审结果，我想说的是，行政诉讼法不是政府做秀的手段，实事证据摆在那里，法院不对具体行政行为进行审查，而以“事实与原告没有利害关系为由，不具有原告诉讼主体资格”驳回起诉。

   建好5年的房屋地基给别人损毁了，还与我没有利害关系。哪什么叫利害关系？

   真是应了广大网民的一句话。“你跟政府讲法律，政府跟你耍流氓。”

   也就是韩寒那句话嘛  “现阶段主要矛盾是人民日益增长的智商和官员们不断下降的道德之间的矛盾”

   目前我已上诉，请广大网民支持。

作者: rawrdinosaur 时间: 2011-5-24 00:49

ty

作者: luqian55 时间: 2011-5-31 08:44

thank you

欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/)