Q2. Bill Kelley, age 55, just retired and accepted an early retirement package from his employer, FertileGro Lawncare. The early retirement package has an estimated value of $1.2 million after taxes. After taking the retirement package, Kelley took a job in customer service at a local hospital and currently has a salary of $50,000 per year. Sharon Kelley, age 54, works part-time as the Treasurer for their church and has a salary of $15,000 per year. They have two children,
Bill and Sharon Kelley recently approached Modern Portfolio Management, Inc. for help in managing their portfolio. At a recent fact-finding meeting, the Kelleys made the following statements:
Modern Portfolio Management presents the Kelleys with four model portfolios. Which of the portfolios would be best suited for the Kelley’s situation?
A) Portfolio 1.
B) Portfolio 2.
C) Portfolio 3.
答案和详解如下:
Correct answer is B)
Portfolio 2 is the optimal portfolio. The Kelley’s have at least a 2 stage time horizon.
The inflows are $50,000 + $15,000 = $65,000 before tax = $65,000 (1-.25) = $48,750 after tax.
The outflows have to be adjusted for inflation since they were last year's costs thus we have:
§ $93,750 total costs last year = $30,000 tuition + $63,750 living expenses
§ Tuition expenses adjusted for inflation are $30,000 × 1.05 = $31,500
§ Living expenses adjusted for inflation are $63,750 × 1.025 = $65,344
§ Total outflows in the first year of retirment = $31,500 + $65,344 = $96,844
Inflows - outflows = $48,750 - $96,844 = -$48,094
Required return = 48,094 / 3,200,000 = 1.5% after tax real required return
Adjusting for inflation = 1.5 + 2.5 = 4.0% after tax nominal required return
4.0 / (1-.25) = 5.33% before tax nominal required return
Portfolio 2 meets the return requirement and also is in line with their low risk tolerance as indicated by not wanting to be in a security that is too risky. Portfolio 3 is also not acceptable because it is not well diversified and has 20% allocated to cash. Portfolio 1 looks like a good choice, especially with its slightly higher return than Portfolio 2 and broad diversification, however the portfolio has a much higher than necessary cash allocation, and the lack of return from cash seems to be made up for by a 10% stake in venture capital. Portfolio 2 appears to be a better match with the Kelley’s risk tolerance.
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |