Board logo

标题: Reading 54: Efficient Capital Markets- LOS c(part 1)~ Q [打印本页]

作者: yanghon    时间: 2009-3-2 13:25     标题: [2009] Session 13 - Reading 54: Efficient Capital Markets- LOS c(part 1)~ Q

 

LOS c, (Part 1): Explain the implications of stock market efficiency for technical analysis and fundamental analysis.

Q1. The conclusion that technical analysis adds no value:

A)   is not supported by fact.

B)   neither of these answers are correct.

C)   supports the weak form of the EMH.

 

Q2. Assuming market efficiency, which of the following statements regarding technical and fundamental analysis is FALSE?

A)   Evidence indicates it is possible to obtain superior returns by investing in mid-cap firms since they tend to be followed by fewer analysts.

B)   The only way to obtain superior results using historical data is to perform a top down analysis examining first the market, then the industry and then individual firms.

C)   Technical analysis that relies exclusively on historical data has no value.

 

Q3. Which of the following actions is most likely to give an analyst superior results?

A)   Having superior abilities to identify patterns of returns based on historical data of economic factors and being able to determine the relationship between a stock return and certain economic factors based on historical data and then use that relationship to make reliable forecasts for future price movements.

B)   The ability to react very quickly to public announcements.

C)   A strong ability to interpret and estimate the future impact of publicly available information.

 

Q4. The performance of professional money managers taken as a whole has been:

A)   below average.

B)   inconsistent with the strong form of the EMH.

C)   above average.

 


作者: yanghon    时间: 2009-3-2 13:25     标题: [2009] Session 13 - Reading 54: Efficient Capital Markets- LOS c(part 1)~ Q

LOS c, (Part 1): Explain the implications of stock market efficiency for technical analysis and fundamental analysis.fficeffice" />

Q1. The conclusion that technical analysis adds no value:

A)   is not supported by fact.

B)   neither of these answers are correct.

C)   supports the weak form of the EMH.

Correct answer is C)

Simple trading rule, autocorrelation and runs tests generally find evidence suggesting that technical analysis based on historical information does not generate significant excess returns.

 

Q2. Assuming market efficiency, which of the following statements regarding technical and fundamental analysis is FALSE?

A)   Evidence indicates it is possible to obtain superior returns by investing in mid-cap firms since they tend to be followed by fewer analysts.

B)   The only way to obtain superior results using historical data is to perform a top down analysis examining first the market, then the industry and then individual firms.

C)   Technical analysis that relies exclusively on historical data has no value.

Correct answer is B)

Assuming market efficiency, any approach, including a top down approach, will not produce superior results as long as it relies exclusively on historical data.

 

Q3. Which of the following actions is most likely to give an analyst superior results?

A)   Having superior abilities to identify patterns of returns based on historical data of economic factors and being able to determine the relationship between a stock return and certain economic factors based on historical data and then use that relationship to make reliable forecasts for future price movements.

B)   The ability to react very quickly to public announcements.

C)   A strong ability to interpret and estimate the future impact of publicly available information.

Correct answer is C)

An analyst cannot obtain superior results by relying on historical data. The analyst must be able to do a superior job of interpreting and estimating variables that are relevant to the value of the security.

 

Q4. The performance of professional money managers taken as a whole has been:

A)   below average.

B)   inconsistent with the strong form of the EMH.

C)   above average.

Correct answer is A)        

The implication of the strong-form tests is that money managers as a group have not outperformed the buy-and-hold policy. In fact after accounting for fees, mutual funds, bank trust departments, pension plans, and endowment funds are not able to match the performance of a simple buy-and-hold policy.


作者: erpang8888    时间: 2009-3-19 13:30

a
作者: connie198226    时间: 2009-3-21 15:30

ss
作者: dullmul    时间: 2009-4-7 14:13

thx
作者: xywwyx    时间: 2009-4-7 14:48

q

 


作者: wangyoucao    时间: 2009-4-17 11:12

thaqnks
作者: kgbvvsscia    时间: 2009-4-20 14:29

thanks


作者: ah149    时间: 2009-4-20 15:33

thx
作者: suodi    时间: 2009-4-22 16:59

[em50]
作者: aspiro    时间: 2009-4-24 11:32

thx

 


作者: hjl2000    时间: 2009-4-25 21:51

d
作者: yangxi_sisi    时间: 2009-4-28 15:41

thx
作者: yangxi_sisi    时间: 2009-4-28 16:08

thx
作者: julian1983    时间: 2009-5-3 12:28

thanks
作者: 大狗狗    时间: 2009-5-14 17:00

K
作者: cynthia85    时间: 2009-5-18 00:37

gf
作者: gracesun    时间: 2009-5-18 07:47

thanks
作者: hhzeng    时间: 2009-5-19 11:55

th
作者: vivianegao    时间: 2009-5-27 03:30

 thanks
作者: miaozhu    时间: 2009-5-28 23:16

22
作者: 蓝山咖啡    时间: 2009-6-1 23:06

 bzd
作者: happysunny    时间: 2009-6-2 23:14

thx!
作者: mma03    时间: 2009-6-4 01:28

thx
作者: yan_superman    时间: 2009-6-6 00:04

 [em50]
作者: big36999    时间: 2009-6-8 08:34

thanx
作者: luodan0103    时间: 2009-8-20 09:11

thanks
作者: lamchoonho    时间: 2009-8-31 15:05

  thanks
作者: baodexi    时间: 2009-10-6 16:58

谢谢
作者: woshidengl    时间: 2009-10-9 12:25

t
作者: nena2749    时间: 2009-10-10 23:39

CXBA
作者: garmun    时间: 2009-10-26 21:43

tq
作者: lqx1211    时间: 2009-11-4 20:35

ss
作者: solitute    时间: 2009-11-5 19:03

thanks
作者: wenganyang    时间: 2009-11-8 02:26

sadf
作者: nuo0206    时间: 2009-11-10 23:23

thanks
作者: haisian    时间: 2009-11-12 11:48

谢谢
作者: xdsunjia    时间: 2009-11-15 20:30

Thx
作者: mellsa    时间: 2009-11-16 20:14

AAA
作者: mellsa    时间: 2009-11-17 07:33

www
作者: njjens    时间: 2009-11-19 08:11     标题: s

s
作者: iloverere    时间: 2009-11-19 16:28

 re
作者: rockmelon    时间: 2009-11-21 23:15

re
作者: tobuketsu    时间: 2009-11-22 06:37     标题: re

th


作者: chouccy    时间: 2009-11-22 11:58

thx
作者: tin_wo    时间: 2009-11-26 15:56

tk
作者: shametospeak    时间: 2009-12-2 23:02

我一定能过
作者: doralin    时间: 2009-12-7 15:13

[em50]
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-15 10:18


作者: jessica_zml    时间: 2010-3-4 01:24

cbba
作者: rongshenggong    时间: 2010-3-7 03:17

A
作者: flyingdance_nan    时间: 2010-3-13 02:39

great
作者: zaestau    时间: 2010-3-24 00:24

ccc
作者: jessica_zml    时间: 2010-3-31 20:40

thanks la


作者: shuru1207    时间: 2010-4-2 07:58

thnx
作者: sophia19    时间: 2010-4-2 17:34

c
作者: gaoxiaoliang    时间: 2010-4-13 08:25

cc
作者: jhqhj    时间: 2010-5-8 15:04

cca
作者: micynthia    时间: 2010-6-3 09:07

..
作者: jerrywang0    时间: 2010-6-15 17:04

q
作者: rotterdamyy    时间: 2010-7-22 17:31     标题: [原创]

thx
作者: casiofd    时间: 2010-8-12 22:46

dll
作者: bobchin    时间: 2010-8-30 23:31

thx
作者: scofield1985    时间: 2010-10-17 15:35

d
作者: echopapa    时间: 2010-11-9 13:56

thx
作者: viss    时间: 2010-11-11 14:51

precisely
作者: seraphiris0116    时间: 2010-11-15 15:47

thanks
作者: danforth    时间: 2010-11-27 20:07

d
作者: khaipinglai    时间: 2010-11-30 00:34

 thanks
作者: spidermanyan    时间: 2010-12-1 13:51

啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2