Board logo

标题: Reading 55: Market Efficiency and Anomalies- LOS b~ Q1-4 [打印本页]

作者: yanghon    时间: 2009-3-2 13:33     标题: [2009] Session 13 - Reading 55: Market Efficiency and Anomalies- LOS b~ Q1-4

 

LOS b: Describe four problems that may prevent arbitrageurs from correcting anomalies.

Q1. At a recent seminar on Capital Market Efficiency, David Thorngate, a seasoned arbitrageur wanted to dispel the notion that all arbitrage trades are successful. During his speech, he made the following statements regarding arbitrage and the ability of arbitrageurs to correct market anomalies:

Statement 1: There are limits on the ability of arbitrage to bring about efficient prices. Arbitrage is frequently not riskless. Just because fundamentals indicate that one stock is undervalued or overvalued relative to another does not mean that trading on this information will be profitable.

Statement 2: Even in "pairs trading," where an arbitrageur buys the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, significant risk from stock-specific factors remains. So, there is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term.

Are Statement 1 and Statement 2 as made by Thorngate correct?

          Statement 1                        Statement 2

 

A)    Incorrect                              Correct

B)    Correct                                Incorrect

C)    Correct                                Correct

 

Q2. Which of the following limits the ability of arbitrage to correct anomalies?

A)   There is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term.

B)   Arbitrage is a relatively riskless activity, which has led to consistently reduced profits for many arbitrageurs, thereby reducing their interest in correcting market anomalies.

C)   Arbitrageurs are sophisticated traders but their short supply precludes the correction of market anomalies.

 

Q3. Which of the following statements about arbitrage and market anomalies is most accurate?

A)   In pairs trading, where an arbitrageur purchases the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, stock-specific risk remains.

B)   If an arbitrageur correctly identifies relative mispricings of similar stocks the correction will take place immediately in the marketplace.

C)   Investors of the funds that arbitrageurs and traders use are generally too patient and fail to remove funds in a timely manner when trades go against them.

 

Q4. Which of the following statements best describes the limits of arbitrage in correcting market anomalies?

A)   There is no limitation to arbitrage in correcting market anomalies because it is a riskless trading activity and once there is a mispricing it will be exploited to its fullest.

B)   Arbitrage is not always riskless as was shown during the internet stock bubble of the 1990s, when traders were short a stock and had to cover their positions at a much higher takeover price.

C)   When fundamentals indicate that a stock is overvalued or undervalued, trading based on this information will be immediately profitable.

 


作者: yanghon    时间: 2009-3-2 13:34     标题: [2009] Session 13 - Reading 55: Market Efficiency and Anomalies- LOS b~ Q1-4

LOS b: Describe four problems that may prevent arbitrageurs from correcting anomalies.fficeffice" />

Q1. At a recent seminar on Capital Market Efficiency, David Thorngate, a seasoned arbitrageur wanted to dispel the notion that all arbitrage trades are successful. During his speech, he made the following statements regarding arbitrage and the ability of arbitrageurs to correct market anomalies:

Statement 1: There are limits on the ability of arbitrage to bring about efficient prices. Arbitrage is frequently not riskless. Just because fundamentals indicate that one stock is undervalued or overvalued relative to another does not mean that trading on this information will be profitable.

Statement 2: Even in "pairs trading," where an arbitrageur buys the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, significant risk from stock-specific factors remains. So, there is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term.

Are Statement 1 and Statement 2 as made by Thorngate correct?

          Statement 1                        Statement 2

 

A)    Incorrect                              Correct

B)    Correct                                Incorrect

C)    Correct                                Correct

Correct answer is C)

There are limits on the ability of arbitrage to bring about efficient prices. Arbitrage is frequently risky. Just because fundamentals indicate that one stock is overpriced relative to another, or absolutely over or underpriced, doesn’t mean that trading based on this information will be profitable.
Even in pairs trading, where an arbitrageur buys the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, significant risk from stock-specific factors remains. There is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term.

 

Q2. Which of the following limits the ability of arbitrage to correct anomalies?

A)   There is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term.

B)   Arbitrage is a relatively riskless activity, which has led to consistently reduced profits for many arbitrageurs, thereby reducing their interest in correcting market anomalies.

C)   Arbitrageurs are sophisticated traders but their short supply precludes the correction of market anomalies.

Correct answer is A)

There is no guarantee that even correctly identified relative mispricings of similar stocks will be corrected in the near term. Investors of the funds that arbitrageurs and traders use can be notoriously impatient, removing funds when trades go against them or if results are not consistently good. Since capital is limited, in periods where there are many apparent mispricings, arbitrageurs will direct capital only to pursue the most attractive trades, leaving other mispricings unexploited.

 

Q3. Which of the following statements about arbitrage and market anomalies is most accurate?

A)   In pairs trading, where an arbitrageur purchases the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, stock-specific risk remains.

B)   If an arbitrageur correctly identifies relative mispricings of similar stocks the correction will take place immediately in the marketplace.

C)   Investors of the funds that arbitrageurs and traders use are generally too patient and fail to remove funds in a timely manner when trades go against them.

Correct answer is A)

Even in pairs trading, where an arbitrageur buys the underpriced security and shorts the overpriced security, significant risk from stock-specific factors remains.

 

Q4. Which of the following statements best describes the limits of arbitrage in correcting market anomalies?

A)   There is no limitation to arbitrage in correcting market anomalies because it is a riskless trading activity and once there is a mispricing it will be exploited to its fullest.

B)   Arbitrage is not always riskless as was shown during the internet stock bubble of the 1990s, when traders were short a stock and had to cover their positions at a much higher takeover price.

C)   When fundamentals indicate that a stock is overvalued or undervalued, trading based on this information will be immediately profitable.

Correct answer is B)       

There are limits on the process of arbitrage to bring about efficient prices. Arbitrage is frequently not riskless. Just because fundamentals indicate that one stock is overpriced relative to another, or absolutely over or underpriced doesn’t mean that trading based on this information will be immediately profitable. One risk with shorting overvalued stocks during the internet stock bubble of the late 90s was that a stock a trader sold short would be taken over at a significantly higher price. The fact that the acquiring firm paid too much for shares offers no solace to short sellers who have to cover their positions at the takeover price.


作者: erpang8888    时间: 2009-3-19 13:09

a
作者: connie198226    时间: 2009-3-21 15:40

ss
作者: dullmul    时间: 2009-4-7 17:03

thx
作者: kgbvvsscia    时间: 2009-4-20 15:10

thanks


作者: suodi    时间: 2009-4-22 16:52

[em50]
作者: ah149    时间: 2009-4-25 02:15

thx
作者: hjl2000    时间: 2009-4-25 21:50

d
作者: yangxi_sisi    时间: 2009-4-30 10:48

xie
作者: lanmark38    时间: 2009-5-5 22:43

see
作者: 大狗狗    时间: 2009-5-14 17:36

K
作者: 流浪狗    时间: 2009-5-15 00:52

thanks
作者: ray0106    时间: 2009-5-15 00:53

D
作者: ijkl326    时间: 2009-5-15 15:54     标题: 楼主帖子真好来支持一下顶一下

喜欢楼主的帖子我拿游戏辅助站来顶你一下


www.caosf.com传奇私服
www.sf996.com英雄合击私服
www.cq2009vip.cn英雄合击
www.9800ok.cnDNF外挂
作者: cynthia85    时间: 2009-5-18 01:26

u

 


作者: gracesun    时间: 2009-5-18 07:50

thanks
作者: hhzeng    时间: 2009-5-19 15:15

th
作者: vivianegao    时间: 2009-5-27 02:53

 ok
作者: youngfwang    时间: 2009-6-1 19:21

qq
作者: 蓝山咖啡    时间: 2009-6-1 21:30

 cbab
作者: cover2421    时间: 2009-6-3 23:14

thanks
作者: mma03    时间: 2009-6-4 02:34

thx
作者: tuotuo415    时间: 2009-6-4 15:41

thx
作者: hjhan    时间: 2009-6-4 20:07

g
作者: yan_superman    时间: 2009-6-5 06:59

 [em50]
作者: big36999    时间: 2009-6-8 08:44

thanx
作者: luodan0103    时间: 2009-8-20 09:24

thanks
作者: lamchoonho    时间: 2009-8-31 15:52

  thanks
作者: jirebecca    时间: 2009-9-4 14:15

:-)
作者: josephine_loh    时间: 2009-9-6 22:43

 tq
作者: aleckkwong    时间: 2009-9-10 10:30

thx
作者: dayhigh    时间: 2009-9-24 15:28

 thx
作者: baodexi    时间: 2009-10-7 04:37

谢谢
作者: woshidengl    时间: 2009-10-9 12:05

thanks
作者: huili_zee    时间: 2009-10-12 22:08

 v
作者: BoyaDeng    时间: 2009-10-13 08:33

thanks
作者: htpeng    时间: 2009-10-16 00:18


作者: garmun    时间: 2009-10-26 21:29

tq

作者: giolu    时间: 2009-10-27 03:22

 thx
作者: lqx1211    时间: 2009-11-4 20:38

ss
作者: solitute    时间: 2009-11-5 19:22

thanks
作者: dreamkhole    时间: 2009-11-8 10:45

thanks
作者: grew    时间: 2009-11-10 16:30

1
作者: nuo0206    时间: 2009-11-10 23:07

thanks

 


作者: haisian    时间: 2009-11-12 12:02

谢谢
作者: mellsa    时间: 2009-11-17 07:37

rrr
作者: njjens    时间: 2009-11-19 08:15     标题: s

s
作者: rockmelon    时间: 2009-11-22 02:25

re
作者: tobuketsu    时间: 2009-11-22 09:39     标题: re

th
作者: cfamike    时间: 2009-11-27 15:26

sdf
作者: doralin    时间: 2009-12-7 16:48

[em50]
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-15 09:59

c
作者: jessica_zml    时间: 2010-3-4 00:16

thank u very much la
作者: rongshenggong    时间: 2010-3-7 03:44

3
作者: flyingdance_nan    时间: 2010-3-13 02:45

great
作者: jessica_zml    时间: 2010-3-31 20:40

thanks la


作者: shuru1207    时间: 2010-4-2 08:06

thnx
作者: sophia19    时间: 2010-4-2 11:06

c
作者: siwanglizan    时间: 2010-4-13 15:55

ding
作者: gaoxiaoliang    时间: 2010-4-13 20:50

cc
作者: zoomair    时间: 2010-4-30 11:16

thanks
作者: jhqhj    时间: 2010-5-8 15:53

caab
作者: chenxu200312    时间: 2010-5-26 04:26

d
作者: danforth    时间: 2010-6-3 12:54

D
作者: micynthia    时间: 2010-6-3 20:28

l
作者: xuantour90    时间: 2010-6-4 13:34

THANKS
作者: zhyue_2000    时间: 2010-6-5 15:58

thx
作者: jerrywang0    时间: 2010-6-15 17:17

q
作者: guozeyu    时间: 2010-8-5 00:06

看看!!!
作者: garcia1    时间: 2010-8-10 21:15

thank you
作者: casiofd    时间: 2010-8-12 22:45

zh
作者: bobchin    时间: 2010-8-30 23:48

thx
作者: scofield1985    时间: 2010-10-17 15:38

d
作者: giraffe_lisa    时间: 2010-10-19 04:28

aaa
作者: heartfc    时间: 2010-10-24 18:08

谢谢楼主的分享
作者: Anyone2010    时间: 2010-10-27 16:08

thks
作者: echopapa    时间: 2010-11-9 14:09

thx
作者: viss    时间: 2010-11-11 13:37

thx
作者: seraphiris0116    时间: 2010-11-15 16:17

thanks
作者: spidermanyan    时间: 2010-12-1 20:00

啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊啊
作者: tangfaxi    时间: 2010-12-2 17:35

谢谢
作者: loveparadox    时间: 2010-12-7 09:21     标题: thx

thx




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2