Board logo

标题: Reading 49: Global Investment Performance Standards Los h~Q1-4 [打印本页]

作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-4-10 16:02     标题: [2009]Session18-Reading 49: Global Investment Performance Standards Los h~Q1-4

 

LOS h: Explain the role of investment mandates, objectives, or strategies in the construction of composites.

Q1. Which of the following reasons is least likely to explain why a portfolio has been moved from one composite to another?

A)   The firm has redefined the composite, and the portfolio no longer falls under the new definition.

B)   The portfolio size has recently fallen below the minimum threshold specified for the “Japanese Value Equities above ¥500 million” composite.

C)   The portfolio size has grown above £5 million and is more suitable to the “UK Equities above £5 million” composite than the “UK Equities below £5 million” composite.

 

Q2. Which of the following descriptions are appropriate qualifiers for a composite?

          "Small Cap"                        "High Duration"                        "Above


作者: youzizhang    时间: 2009-4-10 16:02     标题: [2009]Session18-Reading 49: Global Investment Performance Standards Los h~Q1-4

 

LOS h: Explain the role of investment mandates, objectives, or strategies in the construction of composites. fficeffice" />

Q1. Which of the following reasons is least likely to explain why a portfolio has been moved from one composite to another?

A)   The firm has redefined the composite, and the portfolio no longer falls under the new definition.

B)   The portfolio size has recently fallen below the minimum threshold specified for the “Japanese Value Equities above ¥500 million” composite.

C)   The portfolio size has grown above £5 million and is more suitable to the “UK Equities above £5 million” composite than the “UK Equities below £5 million” composite.

Correct answer is B)

All of the suggestions could be valid reasons for moving a portfolio into or out from a composite. However, if a portfolio falls below a specified minimum and the drop is not likely to be permanent, then the portfolio may remain in that composite in the short-term.

 

Q2. Which of the following descriptions are appropriate qualifiers for a composite?

          "Small Cap"                        "High Duration"                        "Above


作者: sweetgao    时间: 2009-4-14 21:37

K
作者: rc2008    时间: 2009-4-15 18:00

K
作者: pundit    时间: 2009-4-16 14:48

k
作者: pundit    时间: 2009-4-22 09:46

a
作者: mashanghao    时间: 2009-4-28 16:33     标题: 回复:(youzizhang)[2009]Session18-Reading 49: Gl...

K
作者: zhouyp1982    时间: 2009-4-28 21:14

 r
作者: miguelliu    时间: 2009-5-8 11:47

 c
作者: gracecfa    时间: 2009-5-13 15:28

v
作者: malesword    时间: 2009-5-26 23:17

l
作者: lzhao2    时间: 2009-6-4 23:51

Thanks
作者: dandinghe4748    时间: 2009-11-17 13:36

ok
作者: jrxx99    时间: 2009-12-29 09:34

谢谢
作者: 1212jo    时间: 2010-1-4 10:28


作者: 1212jo    时间: 2010-1-4 10:28


作者: leeyaoxee    时间: 2010-4-11 02:31     标题: 回复:(youzizhang)[2009]Session18-Reading 49: Gl...

Thanks.
作者: 思霖    时间: 2010-9-27 14:12

Thanks!
作者: maxsimax    时间: 2011-4-26 10:43

tq
作者: deqiang    时间: 2011-5-20 12:05

thanks.
作者: luqian55    时间: 2011-5-24 16:24

thank you
作者: rawrdinosaur    时间: 2011-5-27 10:53

ty




欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) Powered by Discuz! 7.2