CFA论坛 - Powered by Discuz! Board

标题: 美国是不是跟中国考题不一样？ [打印本页]

作者: crystalw 时间: 2009-6-8 22:07 标题: 美国是不是跟中国考题不一样？

看大家讨论的好多题都没印象，也没看到什么IFRS, 觉得比Mock简单很多，上下午都差不多难度。是不是因为时差关系题不一样？有没有在美国东部考的？

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-8 22:11

yes...in Boston...

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-8 22:12

I didn't see IFRS either...[em54]

作者: alpswolf 时间: 2009-6-8 22:15

我猜想每个考场的题目不完全一样.

作者: crystalw 时间: 2009-6-8 22:18

松口气。。。考试时做得太快了，现在担心很多细节没注意到，感觉没有什么题要用到IFRS和GAAP的区别.

作者: crystalw 时间: 2009-6-8 22:21

感觉跟Mock很不一样，mock几乎FSA开始每道题都有表和数字，但考试时概念很多，特别是notes每个session前面几个LOS的内容很多,复习时都没仔细注意，后来翻翻发现有的notes上都没有。唉，要是考不过下次要多注意概念而非计算了

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-8 22:25

True...Notes are really useful..it covers almost everything on the exam...as long as you read through the 5 books in a thorough way

作者: best_tu 时间: 2009-6-9 01:09

Boston考的

有不少IFRS，只有两道GAAP

但其他题目和版上讨论的出路也比较大

作者: jeffie 时间: 2009-6-9 01:19

我在美东考的。有IFRS，印象很深因为在pension accounting那一块儿，正好前一天看过。
是不是每个考场都不一样

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-9 02:28

QUOTE:

以下是引用best_tu在2009-6-9 1:09:00的发言：
Boston考的有不少IFRS，只有两道GAAP 但其他题目和版上讨论的出路也比较大

What do you mean "lots of IFRS" here? You mean the questions stated "IFRS", or like what others said there was a note bolded "all calculations require IFRS except for those noting GAAP" on the top of the whole section?

Lots of students in China said there was a black bold note above the section requiring treating the questions in the IFRS way...I didn't notice it at all..bummer

I do remember lots of quetions are around comparing GAAP vs IFRS, but those questions straightforwardly stated either GAAP or IFRS....

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-9 02:31

QUOTE:

以下是引用jeffie在2009-6-9 1:19:00的发言：
我在美东考的。有IFRS，印象很深因为在pension accounting那一块儿，正好前一天看过。是不是每个考场都不一样

ehh..I don't remember this question about pension accounting? What is it about? Could u pls help me refresh my memory a bit?~~

作者: jeffie 时间: 2009-6-9 02:41

QUOTE:

以下是引用leekeewen在2009-6-9 2:31:00的发言：

ehh..I don't remember this question about pension accounting? What is it about? Could u pls help me refresh my memory a bit?~~

哎，说不定帮你refresh memory以后就发现又是我自己摆乌龙了。。我记不得题干说什么了，反正提到了IFRS。整个大题考的是pension accounting和stock option compensation accounting。第一道题问这个公司会在financial statement上汇报多少的pension obligation.如果是GAAP，那就是net funded status。而IFRS允许有对previous accounting period的adjustment。 but again,也许是我记错了。。。

作者: leekeewen 时间: 2009-6-9 03:11

QUOTE:

以下是引用jeffie在2009-6-9 2:41:00的发言：

ehh....you are talking about Level II bah...xia si wo leh...

作者: jeffie 时间: 2009-6-9 04:29

QUOTE:

以下是引用leekeewen在2009-6-9 3:11:00的发言：

ehh....you are talking about Level II bah...xia si wo leh...

啊，不好意思，我就知道是自己摆乌龙了。。。

作者: sayyescici 时间: 2009-6-9 05:05

pension has the question about IFAS: asked for fund status.

If it was GAAP, your answer should be the real economic status

If question was with IFAS, your answer should be adjusted 2 items: un-xxxx, un-xxx. I recalled there were two items in the table were given and were needed to get the answer.

作者: yrymaomao 时间: 2009-6-9 08:20

DC, It has several questions about IFAS, one is when consolidating, how to treat the contingency debt?

作者: arabdopsis1 时间: 2009-6-9 09:19

我在boston考的l1；下午发现卷子最上方写着'如果不特别表明，是以IFRS为准'；早上都没有注意，555；不过也就一两道题好像必须用到这个default

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-6-9 9:20:23编辑过]

作者: xiaorick 时间: 2009-6-9 18:16

of coure difference

when us/europe finished the papers, asia pacific haven't started yet

as what i know this year, singapore/ hong kong use the same paper

too many ppl, ~5000

欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/)