[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-28 21:12:40编辑过]
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
天道酬勤
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | * | - |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | * | - |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | * | - |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | * | - |
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | * | - |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
通过率高出前一次10%,不知道这是不是历史上最大的变化幅度。
虽然CFA institute本身是有些商业性质的,但这个结果表明它已经更加商业化。这明摆着让level1贬值,“刺激”--而非鼓励level1的人去考level2--如果随后公布的level2的通过率还“正常”的话。
我也是刚开始练的菜鸟,也不知道这次报名人数以及其它考生情况的变化,仅凭我所知道的关于通过率的信息评论。
毫无谴责CFA Institute的意思,没准儿这也是它对低迷的job market的一点儿帮助。不过很想看到它对这个结果的评论。
能想到的受影响的是所有从前和现在拿到level1的人。如果以后通过率超过60%了,那所有人的level1都将几乎一钱不值。对于我这个就想拿个level1表示一下finance方面的intention and capability的人,更是产生压力--这个通过率会让我认真地考虑level2。唉,真累!
刚才google了一下,截至09年4月份,中国大陆的CFA考生注册人数是将近2万(19,700)。假设有50%是考试六月lelve1的,那就是大约1万。level1的全球通过率三十多的时候,中国是50以上。这次中国的通过率估计能达到60-70。假设是65%(你不过的概率只有1/3!),那就是将近7000人。当然高的通过率会吸引高的报名人数,这样通过率还会下来。但是通过人数应该只增不减。就是说CFA光level1每年(两次)中国就是将近1万好几千。如果快速增长的中国经济赶不上更快速度的CFA member production的话,那CFA member在中国也就跟在美国一样了--1,不希罕,2,不保证好工作。你只能靠机会,靠表现更多的才干来获得好的工作。
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-28 22:35:19编辑过]
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | * | - |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | * | - | - |
- | Economics | 24 | - | * | - |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | * | - |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | * | - | - |
- | Economics | 24 | - | * | - |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | * | - |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
Multiple Choice
Q# |
Topic |
Max Pts |
<=50% |
51%-70% |
>70% |
- |
Alternative Investments |
8 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Corporate Finance |
20 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Derivatives |
12 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Economics |
24 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Equity Investments |
24 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Ethical & Professional Standards |
36 |
- |
* |
- |
- |
Financial Reporting & Analysis |
48 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Fixed Income Investments |
28 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Portfolio Management |
12 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Quantitative Methods |
28 |
- |
* |
- |
看了大家的成绩吓一跳。是不是没有全过70%就是低分呀
通过率高出前一次10%,不知道这是不是历史上最大的变化幅度。
虽然CFA institute本身是有些商业性质的,但这个结果表明它已经更加商业化。这明摆着让level1贬值,“刺激”--而非鼓励level1的人去考level2--如果随后公布的level2的通过率还“正常”的话。
我也是刚开始练的菜鸟,也不知道这次报名人数以及其它考生情况的变化,仅凭我所知道的关于通过率的信息评论。
毫无谴责CFA Institute的意思,没准儿这也是它对低迷的job market的一点儿帮助。不过很想看到它对这个结果的评论。
能想到的受影响的是所有从前和现在拿到level1的人。如果以后通过率超过60%了,那所有人的level1都将几乎一钱不值。对于我这个就想拿个level1表示一下finance方面的intention and capability的人,更是产生压力--这个通过率会让我认真地考虑level2。唉,真累!
刚才google了一下,截至09年4月份,中国大陆的CFA考生注册人数是将近2万(19,700)。假设有50%是考试六月lelve1的,那就是大约1万。level1的全球通过率三十多的时候,中国是50以上。这次中国的通过率估计能达到60-70。假设是65%(你不过的概率只有1/3!),那就是将近7000人。当然高的通过率会吸引高的报名人数,这样通过率还会下来。但是通过人数应该只增不减。就是说CFA光level1每年(两次)中国就是将近1万好几千。如果快速增长的中国经济赶不上更快速度的CFA member production的话,那CFA member在中国也就跟在美国一样了--1,不希罕,2,不保证好工作。你只能*机会,*表现更多的才干来获得好的工作。
CFA institute应该是是个non profit的,但目前看到的这个做法让人怀疑它的运作太商业性--有点儿超过大家的expectation.
麻烦的是考生/memeber。以后的简历都要这么写:
CFA level 1 (not Jun 09 exam)
CFA level 1 (Jun 09, all >70%)
...
投资总算小有回报 all>70%
祝大家好运。
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | * | - | - |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | * | - |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | * | - |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
CFA institute应该是是个non profit的,但目前看到的这个做法让人怀疑它的运作太商业性--有点儿超过大家的expectation.
麻烦的是考生/memeber。以后的简历都要这么写:
CFA level 1 (not Jun 09 exam)
CFA level 1 (Jun 09, all >70%)
...
过了就好!
大家也放平心态,提高通过率也是对形势的一种应对,也没必要过份去批判所谓的商业化。假设这次通过只有30%,估计也会遭大家的批判。这次金融危机百年难遇,CFA适当作出些调整也是应该的,其实,大家拿到卷子做完后应该知道这次的调整了。
关于证书是否贬值。我是做投行的,进入了投行圈子后证书永远不是最重要的,而是的deal experience,公司里也从来没发现CFA有特别过人之处的,但通过CFA的知识基础确实扎实,但deal的成败和个人的发展,远远取决之外的很多因素。
过了就准备level2吧,觉得没意思也可以不再继续考了,但个人理解无须抱怨其他不能决定的客观因素。
以上个人胡言一通。
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | - | * |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-29 2:14:43编辑过]
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-29 2:18:07编辑过]
Passed。 成绩一般。
问一下,楼上面有人说中国地区通过率60%,这是官方统计的,还是自己估计的?我看到官方数据说(找到链接发上来),上一次亚太区通过率和全球通过率差不多,中国地区不至于那么高吧。
all>70%
不过说的也是,通过率这么高,考试费这么贵...
God Bless! 4 Days prepare for the exam.. Pass
Level 2 I''m Coming!
God Bless! 4 Days prepare for the exam.. Pass
Level 2 I''m Coming!
估计考到65%的同学 都能过,本人 考前N次模拟题的成绩 在都66%-75%之间, 考试当场比较容易,感觉相当地好,
考后对题有不少错误,估计错误题目都被我找出来了
怎么就这么寸呢, 有些同学险险没过的 也不妨贴出来 有数据分析的
Multiple Choice
Q# |
Topic |
Max Pts |
<=50% |
51%-70% |
>70% |
- |
Alternative Investments |
8 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Corporate Finance |
20 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Derivatives |
12 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Economics |
24 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Equity Investments |
24 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Ethical & Professional Standards |
36 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Financial Reporting & Analysis |
48 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Fixed Income Investments |
28 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Portfolio Management |
12 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Quantitative Methods |
28 |
- |
* |
- |
PS 大家先复制到WORD里 再贴过来 保持格式
Multiple Choice
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | * | - | - |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | * | - |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
每个人的情况都不同,偶的成绩也一般,但总算过了。不要去质疑CFA的商业结构,不爽就不要来考,考了还JJWW的,这岂不是在说你自己是SB。从来不羡慕那些所谓的牛人:看了几天就过了,有啥好牛掰的。过程很重要,感觉学了不少东西,过了也算鼓励了我一下。 希望Level 2也可以顺利通过。
Reply to Lilong
不知道你说的商业结构是啥意思?
同意你说的“不爽就不要来考”,但没考前还不知道会有些不爽,所以考了。如果通过率回到当年70-80的水平,确实可能大家就都不来考了。
一个事情的含金量和易得度永远是矛盾。有人喜欢它保持含金量,哪怕自己费尽九牛二虎去获得。有人喜欢其他组合,这都无可厚非。在没有看到CFA Institute官方解释之前,持不同观点、组合的考生发表个人分析和意见,这有什么大惊小怪,更轮不着你说“SB”。
同意你说的“过程很重要”,学到了东西。
我也“从来不羡慕那些所谓的牛人”
Q# | Topic | Max Pts | <=50% | 51%-70% | >70% |
- | Alternative Investments | 8 | - | * | - |
- | Corporate Finance | 20 | - | - | * |
- | Derivatives | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Economics | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Equity Investments | 24 | - | - | * |
- | Ethical & Professional Standards | 36 | - | - | * |
- | Financial Reporting & Analysis | 48 | - | - | * |
- | Fixed Income Investments | 28 | - | - | * |
- | Portfolio Management | 12 | - | - | * |
- | Quantitative Methods | 28 | - | - | * |
by Jimmyjohn
I am a repeater. Finally I passed. Keep it up for those who lose & Congratulations to those who passed.
Though the truth is passing rate increases, please don't whine about the standard as that would really give the impression and spread the message passing CFA level I is common.
It in turns ruins our effort to knock off such exam.
Let's be positive and either just keep slugging it or quit. The US seems to treat the crisis fine so far. Hope CFAI treats this issue fine as well.
All the best.
Reply to Jimmyjohn
Agree with all what you said. Just hope a discussion to find the cause of the spike... and impact of that to Level 1 members.
Absolutely having no intention to spread message damaging the value of CFA that I got it hard. Wish the Institute won't do it on their end--they better have a good reason to explain to some point. cheers.
[此贴子已经被作者于2009-7-29 23:54:52编辑过]
我也晒一下!
考前2礼拜开始做题,正确率从15%提到68%,可以给自己发个进步奖。哈哈。。 最高一次就68%,总共复习了2个月(累计将近180小时)。。。 都说通过率很高,不过跟我没关系,我过了,特别开心。。
Multiple Choice
Q# |
Topic |
Max Pts |
<=50% |
51%-70% |
>70% |
- |
Alternative Investments |
8 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Corporate Finance |
20 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Derivatives |
12 |
- |
* |
- |
- |
Economics |
24 |
- |
* |
- |
- |
Equity Investments |
24 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Ethical & Professional Standards |
36 |
- |
* |
- |
- |
Financial Reporting & Analysis |
48 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Fixed Income Investments |
28 |
- |
* |
- |
- |
Portfolio Management |
12 |
- |
- |
* |
- |
Quantitative Methods |
28 |
- |
- |
* |
请问 所有科目都必须70%以上才能算是通过么?请直接回复我~谢谢
不是必须都要70%,综合60%就可以过的
通过率挺高的吗/
关注。
好强啊
欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/) | Powered by Discuz! 7.2 |