CFA论坛 - Powered by Discuz! Board

标题: 真看不懂怎么评分的 [打印本页]

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 09:10 标题: 真看不懂怎么评分的

好同情他
Level 2: Fail
Alternative Investments 18 - - *
- Corporate Finance 36 - - *
- Derivatives 36 - - *
- Economics 18 * - -
- Equity Investments 72 - * -
- Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - * -
- Financial Reporting & Analysis 72 - - *
- Fixed Income Investments 36 - - *
- Portfolio Management 18 * - -
- Quantitative Methods 18 - - *
Performance band of your overall score among all candidates who failed the exam: 10

好羡慕她，真心话
Level 2: Pass
Alternative Investments 18          * - -
Corporate Finance 36                - - *
Derivatives 36                      - * -
Economics 18                        - - *
Equity Investments 72               - * -
Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - * -
Financial Reporting & Analysis 72   - * -
Fixed Income Investments 36         - * -
Portfolio Management 18             * - -
Quantitative Methods 18             - - *

自爆

Level 2: Fail
Alternative Investments 18 * - -
- Corporate Finance 36 - * -
- Derivatives 36 - * -
- Economics 18 - - *
- Equity Investments 72 - - *
- Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - * -
- Financial Reporting & Analysis 72 - * -
- Fixed Income Investments 36 - - *
- Portfolio Management 18 - * -
- Quantitative Methods 18 * - -
band7

作者: ffkly 时间: 2009-8-19 09:12

跨度太大了，同样70%，可能是71，可能是99，很难说的

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 09:14

结论跨度也不小，我就band7

作者: Libero 时间: 2009-8-19 09:16

 这表格只是强弱项分析，每个档跨度大着了，第二张表的理论最高分肯定比第一张表的理论最低分高啊，只是碰巧第一个在每个档里比较靠近下限，第二个在每个档里比较靠上限。

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 09:18

第一第二人都是2个差啊，50排前面也不会比70排后面好吧

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-8-19 9:19:07编辑过]

作者: blackchalk 时间: 2009-8-19 09:21

关键权益投资和财务要高

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 09:45

再收，我更同情他

Level 2: Fail
- Alternative Investments 18 - - *
- Corporate Finance 36 * - -
- Derivatives 36 - - *
- Economics 18 * - -
- Equity Investments 72 - * -
- Ethical & Professional Standards 36 - - *
- Financial Reporting & Analysis 72 - - *
- Fixed Income Investments 36 - - *
- Portfolio Management 18 - - *
- Quantitative Methods 18 * - -
Performance band of your overall score among all candidates who failed the exam: 9

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 11:30

也可能是恶作剧，骗人的

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-19 12:12

Hi, Me too in band 10. I don't know how this is possible.... Similar to yours. Check out m results below: AI - >70% Corp fin>70% Derivatives<50% Econ>70% Equity>51-70% Ethics>51-70% FRA>70% Fixed income>51-70% Portfolio>51-70% Quants>51-70% So I failed the exam coz I failed derivatives???? Guys...ny explanation? ......

作者: conscript 时间: 2009-8-20 08:53

Does anyone have a better fail?

http://www.analystforum.com/phorums/read.php?12,1045095

大家可以看看这个帖子

作者: 泪海孤鸿 时间: 2009-8-20 09:28

绝对是恶作剧！

作者: april422 时间: 2009-8-20 11:07

下次再接再厉，都保high就不担心了

作者: lyzhang01 时间: 2009-8-21 14:14

你没发现这个人两个72题的section都是〉70%么？

说明最终评分，每个section的权重基本是和题目数量成正比的。

作者: clubmuse 时间: 2009-8-24 00:18

是看总通过题目数的，各项成绩只是给你看你的优势劣势，这就是为什么有的人挂了3项依然通过，而有的人一项没挂也挂了的原因，说明后者各项基本都是靠近50通过的，而前者过了的部分都是在90左右，挂了的项也是45左右

欢迎光临 CFA论坛 (http://forum.theanalystspace.com/)