Which of the following statements would most strengthen the argument that commodity futures are not an asset class:
Statement 1: Hedy Gaal establishes a short position in cocoa bean futures for her managed futures fund in a contango market. She expects no change in the spot price of cocoa by contract expiration.
Statement 2: Jeff Anka buys ten 60-day wheat futures in a backwardated market. A month after his purchase, the price of wheat drops dramatically and he sells his position at a significant loss.
Statement 3: The German hedge fund Neulander recently established a speculative long position in sugar futures in a contango market. Through careful active management the fund is able to achieve a positive roll yield when it closes its position.
Statement 1 strengthens the argument that commodity futures are an asset class. This is because a short position in futures in a contango market, when assuming no change in the spot price, would result in a positive roll yield and hence positive cash flow to Gaal’s fund (think of this as selling high and buying low).
By contrast, even though Anka bought the wheat futures in a backwardated market with the expectation of achieving a positive roll yield, futures prices must converge to the spot price closer to maturity. The loss on the futures position translates to a negative roll yield, favoring the argument that commodity futures are not an asset class.
In Statement 3, Neulander is able to achieve positive returns through active management regardless of market conditions. Since the positive return means the futures are valuable, this favors the argument that commodity futures are an asset class.
|