- UID
- 223346
- 帖子
- 483
- 主题
- 49
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2013-9-12
|
An analyst has prepared the following scenarios for Schneider, Inc.:
Scenario 1 Assumptions:- Tax rate is 40%.
- Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) = 12%.
- Constant growth rate in free cash flow = 3%.
- Last year, free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) = $30.
- Target debt ratio = 10%.
Scenario 2 Assumptions:- Tax rate is 40%.
- Expenses before interest and taxes (EBIT), capital expenditures, and depreciation will grow at 15% for the next three years.
- After three years, the growth in EBIT will be 2%, and capital expenditure and depreciation will offset each other.
- WACC during high growth stage = 20%.
- WACC during stable growth stage = 12%.
- Target debt ratio = 10%.
Scenario 2 FCFF | Year 0 (last year) | Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | EBIT | $15.00 | $17.25 | $19.84 | $22.81 | $23.27 | Capital Expenditures | 6.00 | 6.90 | 7.94 | 9.13 | | Depreciation | 4.00 | 4.60 | 5.29 | 6.08 | | Change in Working Capital | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.20 | 2.40 | 2.40 | FCFF | | 5.95 | 7.06 | 8.25 | 11.56 |
Assuming that Schneider, Inc., slightly increases its financial leverage, what should happen to its firm value? The firm value should:A)
| not change because financial leverage has no relationship with firm value. |
| B)
| increase due to the additional value of interest tax shields. |
| C)
| decline due to the increase in risk. |
|
For small changes in leverage, the additional value added by the interest tax shields will more than offset the additional risk of bankruptcy / financial distress. Given the tax advantage of debt, the firm's WACC should decline, not increase with small changes in leverage. |
|