返回列表 发帖
thanks

TOP

回复:(8586)2008 CFA Level 2 - Mock Exam 2 (PM...

dd

TOP

3x

TOP

thanks

TOP

thx

TOP

Thank you so much

TOP

2008 CFA Level 2 - Mock Exam 2 (PM)模考试题 Q3 (part 1 - Part 6)

Question 3

John Rains, CFA, is a professor of finance at a large university located in the Eastern United States. He is actively involved with his local chapter of the Society of Financial Analysts. Recently, he was asked to teach one session of a Society-sponsored CFA review course, specifically teaching the class addressing the topic of quantitative analysis. Based upon his familiarity with the CFA exam, he decides that the first part of the session should be a review of the basic elements of quantitative analysis, such as hypothesis testing, regression and multiple regression analysis. He would like to devote the second half of the review session to the practical application of the topics he covered in the first half.

Rains decides to construct a sample regression analysis case study for his students in order to demonstrate a “real-life” application of the concepts. He begins by compiling financial information on a fictitious company called Big Rig, Inc. According to the case study, Big Rig is the primary producer of the equipment used in the exploration for and drilling of new oil and gas wells in the United States. Rains has based the information in the problem on an actual equity holding in his personal portfolio, but has simplified the data for the purposes of the review course.

Rains constructs a basic regression model for Big Rig in order to estimate its profitability (in millions), using two independent variables: the number of new wells drilled in the U.S. (WLS) and the number of new competitors (COMP) entering the market:

Profits = b0 + b1WLS – b2COMP + ε

Based on the model, the estimated regression equation is:

Profits = 22.5 + 0.98(WLS) − 0.35(COMP)

Using the past 5 years of quarterly data, he calculated the following regression estimates for Big Rig, Inc:

 

Coefficient

Standard Error

Intercept

22.5

2.465

WLS

0.98

0.683

COMP

0.35

0.186

 

Part 1)

Using the information presented, the t-statistic for the number of new competitors (COMP) coefficient is:

A)   1.435.

B)   9.128.

C)   0.142.

D)   1.882.

Part 2)

Rains asks his students to test the null hypothesis that states for every new well drilled, profits will be increased by the given multiple of the coefficient, all other factors remaining constant. The appropriate hypotheses for this two-tailed test can best be stated as:

A)   H0: b1 = 0.35 versus Ha: b1 ≠ 0.35.

B)   H0: b1 ≤ 0.35 versus Ha: b1 > 0.35.

C)   H0: b1 ≤ 0.98 versus Ha: b1 > 0.98.

D)   H0: b1 = 0.98 versus Ha: b1 ≠ 0.98.

 

Part 3)

Continuing with the analysis of Big Rig, Rains asks his students to calculate the mean squared error(MSE). Assume that the sum of squared errors (SSE) for the regression model is 359.

A)   17.956.

B)   19.927.

C)   18.896.

D)   21.118.

 

Part 4)

Rains now wants to test the students’ knowledge of the use of the F-test and the interpretation of the F-statistic. Which of the following statements regarding the F-test and the F-statistic is the most correct?

A)   The F-statistic is almost always formulated to test each independent variable separately, in order to identify which variable is the most statistically significant.

B)   The F-test is usually formulated as a two-tailed test.

C)   To be considered statistically significant, the calculated F-statistic must be equal to or less than the critical F-value at the appropriate level of significance.

D)   The F-statistic is used to test whether at least one independent variable in a set of independent variables explains a significant portion of the variation of the dependent variable.

 

Part 5)

One of the main assumptions of a multiple regression model is that the variance of the residuals is constant across all observations in the sample. A violation of the assumption is known as:

A)   positive serial correlation.

B)   robust standard errors.

C)   heteroskedasticity.

D)   negative serial correlation.

 

Part 6)

Rains reminds his students that a common condition that can distort the results of a regression analysis is referred to as serial correlation. The presence of serial correlation can be detected through the use of:

A)   the Breusch-Pagen test.

B)   the Durbin-Watson statistic.

C)   a discriminant model.

D)   the Hansen method.

 

TOP

thanks

thanks

TOP

thanks

TOP

[em01]

TOP

返回列表