- UID
- 217790
- 帖子
- 226
- 主题
- 170
- 注册时间
- 2011-5-24
- 最后登录
- 2012-9-12
|
Look at the Q then see my comment afterward. Thanks
Ben Jacobs, CFA, is attempting to calculate a historical equity risk premium. His first estimate uses geometric mean equity returns and long-term bond yields. His second estimate uses arithmetic mean returns and short-term bond yields. The effect of the changes in methodology in the second estimate, relative to the first, will:
A) both decrease the size of the risk premium.
B) have offsetting effects.
C) both increase the size of the risk premium.
Your answer: B was incorrect. The correct answer was C) both increase the size of the risk premium.
Switching from a geometric mean to an arithmetic mean will increase the mean equity return. All else being equal, that will increase the estimated risk premium. When the yield curve slopes upward, short-term bonds yield less than long-term bonds. Thus, the equity risk premium estimate will be larger when short-term bond rates are used.
*Comment/Question*
"
Switching from a geometric mean to an arithmetic mean will increase the mean equity return."
Fine, I get that, moving on,
When the yield curve slopes upward, short-term bonds yield less than long-term bonds. Thus, the equity risk premium estimate will be larger when short-term bond rates are used.
What ? How? If the curve is upward sloping, Kd is lower on the short end, higher on the long end.
Since Ke=Kd+ b(Rm-Rf), wouldn't the Premium just increase with the Rf *OR* Kd would increase? (maintain the spread) just raising Ke? |
|