- UID
- 223432
- 帖子
- 312
- 主题
- 12
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
3#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:23
| 只看该作者
I've studied this outside of this curriculum, and I don't think we are responsible for optimization. Right?
Anyway...
SHOULD you take in the new stock? The test is (current sharpe)*(correlation) = .12*.3 = .036. The new stocks sharpe of .10 is higher than .036, so, yes, you should consider adding the new stock.
What will be the new sharpe? Either there's some numerical gymnastic tricks that aren't coming to my mind, or you need to know the expected return of the current portfolio and the new stock, AND you need to know how much value you are adding.
At that point, you will have your weights, and will determined the combined expected values and combined portfolio variance (and std dev). New sharpe is (Rcomb - Rf)/STDcomb.
As for optimization, it's the highest point on the CAL. The slope of the CAL is the Sharpe ratio. The point of tangency will depend on the indifference curve, i think. |
|