- UID
- 223448
- 帖子
- 263
- 主题
- 8
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2014-8-7
|
2#
发表于 2011-7-11 19:27
| 只看该作者
There are a few key sentences here:
1) The tax-free investment information is not meaningful to Jones Corp.
2) The brokerage in question provides the lowest commissions and best execution.
Therefore, to take a common sense approach (not usually useful in ethics, I know), Farnsworth is booking trades for Jones with the broker with best execution, so it is not a violation in that sense. Because the information received is not relevant to Jones, he doesn't need to use it for their account. If he received the information, it was relevant to Jones, and he didn't use it for Jones' account, then that would be a violation.
Voting the way the client asked is fine of course, especially since it was the better option. If it wasn't, Farnsworth would be obligated to share his opinion with Jones. If he still wanted to vote the same way, that's fine, because Farnsworth gave his opinion.
Sorry if I went off on a few tangents there... |
|