Robert Hamilton, a CFA candidate, is preparing a research report on Pets-R-Us for public distribution. Hamilton's preliminary report contains unfavorable earnings forecasts for the next four quarters. As part of his analysis, Hamilton met with Linda Brisson, the president of Pets-R-Us, and asked her to review the preliminary report for factual inaccuracies. Brisson revised Hamilton's earnings forecasts so that the quarterly earnings showed an upward trend and resulted in positive earnings by the fourth quarter. Hamilton included the revised earnings figures in his report without further review. Although the final report included the basic characteristics of Pets-R-Us, it emphasized certain areas such as projected quarterly earnings but only briefly touched on others. According to CFA Institute Standards of Professional Conduct on research reports, Hamilton: A) | did not violate the Standard. |
| B) | violated the Standard because he asked Brisson to review the report for factual inaccuracies. |
| C) | violated the Standard because the report did not give similar attention to all areas but instead emphasized quarterly earnings at the expense of other areas. |
| D) | violated the Standard because he did not thoroughly review and analyze any information provided by Brisson. |
|
Answer and Explanation
Standard V(B) permits Hamilton to ask company management to review his report for factual inaccuracies, but Hamilton should have taken care to thoroughly review and analyze any information provided by the company. The research report should have remained the product of Hamilton's own independent and objective analysis. Hamilton is not required to give equal emphasis to all areas but can emphasize certain areas, touch briefly on others, and omit certain aspects deemed unimportant.
|