- UID
- 222308
- 帖子
- 397
- 主题
- 6
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-2
- 最后登录
- 2016-8-1
|
6#
发表于 2013-4-17 19:44
| 只看该作者
I’m going to differ from the majority and say that Schweser was enough for me for L2. I did not touch the CFAI books. I did get
My preparation material consisted of Schweser Notes, QBank, Secret Sauce, and the Schweser practice exams. I started studying when I got my December L1 results (late January), and put in maybe 150-200 hours.
Since I did not read the CFAI text at all, I cannot say how it compares to Schweser material. However, after spotting the blatant error towards the end of the June 2009 L2 exam, my confidence in CFAI material has decreased. Schweser was adequate for me, though obviously, the same study material will not be suitable for everyone.
I majored in Economics in college and have lots of experience in derivatives and quantitative finance. I have absolutely no training in accounting, financial statements, or fundamental valuation, other than what is in the CFA syllabus.
It is good that you are looking for diverse opinions on CFA study material. I suggest that you compare your background to those of other people who express opinions here, so you can determine which advice is most applicable to you. Also, consider the risk/reward trade-off of each option. Passing the CFA exams is relatively inconsequential to me, so I chose the study material that I believed I could get through in the least amount of time, in order to preserve my work-life balance. If the CFA designation is extremely important to you, the most comprehensive option might be preferable to the most efficient option.
Good luck, in any case. I’m sure that you will perform admirably regardless of which study material you choose. |
|