- UID
- 223227
- 帖子
- 654
- 主题
- 170
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-11
- 最后登录
- 2016-4-19
|
38#
发表于 2012-3-23 11:39
| 只看该作者
Bill Litner, CFA has been hired by Terrific Tires, Inc. (TTI) to counsel TTI’s employees concerning their investments. Jill Fisher is one of the employees and she approaches Litner to help her manage her personal finances. Fisher is 36, and earns $30,000 per year from her job at TTI. She rents an apartment, has about $5,000 in savings, and $3,000 in credit card debt. She is divorced with a 12-year old child and does not receive alimony or child support. A previous analysis performed by a financial expert from the company had predicted that Fisher’s defined benefit pension plan would be able to support her in her retirement at her current standard of living. TTI’s medical coverage is very good and will cover her in her retirement. Although Fisher has no other source of income, she recently inherited approximately $2 million in cash from a distant relative, and that is the reason she has approached Litner. After an initial consultation, Fisher asks Litner to be her investment advisor. As a first step, Litner attempts to assess Fisher’s personality type with the use of a questionnaire. The questionnaire indicates that she is conservative in that she will want to know with some certainty the lower limit of the value of her portfolio in the future. Also, she wants to be informed about every aspect of the investment process, e.g., get detailed information concerning every investment recommendation that Litner makes for her portfolio before approving it. Part of the questionnaire attempts to determine how open Fisher is to changes. The questionnaire’s results indicate that she is willing to adjust and sell positions readily, even at a loss, if new information indicates a change is needed. Litner intends to use the information from the questionnaire to compose an investment policy statement (IPS). He feels that he should compose the outline of the statement in a consultation with Fisher. When Litner asks Fisher to meet with him to compose an IPS, Fisher tells Litner that she does not see the need for such a statement. She says that she thinks that Litner’s credentials are excellent. Furthermore, since she has indicated that she intends to review in depth all of Litner‘s recommendations, having such a statement is unnecessary. Litner attempts to gather the information he needs through a series of informal conversations. During one conversation, he gleans from Fisher her returns expectations. During a later conversation, he questions her concerning her attitudes towards risk and other tastes and preferences. Fisher asks Litner to send her information on Litner’s first recommendation for her $2 million portfolio. She asks that he send to her such information one at a time for her to review so she can build her portfolio steadily one investment at a time. Fisher tells Litner at the outset that she wants to avoid frequent rebalancing and turnover because she has heard the costs and tax consequences of rebalancing and turnover can have a significant and negative impact on the returns of the portfolio. Litner’s insistence on an investment policy statement (IPS) is: A)
| justified because it is beneficial for both Fisher and Litner. |
| B)
| not justified, and it should be considered optional. |
| C)
| justified because it is beneficial for Litner but not necessarily for Fisher. |
|
An IPS benefits both the client and the advisor. For example, it benefits the client because it sets guidelines for every recommendation by the advisor and it benefit’s the advisor because it protects the advisor in cases where investments do not perform exactly as expected. (Study Session 4, LOS 10.h)
Given Fisher’s age and her source of wealth, Fisher’s familiarity with risk taking is: A)
| most likely minimal, and she should be willing to accept a lower than average level of risk. |
| B)
| most likely minimal, but she should be willing to accept a higher than average level of risk. |
| C)
| probably high given her lifestyle, and she should be willing to accept a higher than average level of risk. |
|
Persons who acquire their wealth through a windfall tend to have minimal familiarity with risk taking. Given that her age is less than 40, she should be able to accept a higher than average level of risk. (Study Session 4, LOS 10.a)
The use of a questionnaire to assess Litner’s personality type is: A)
| a standard approach, and Fisher appears to be a methodical investor. |
| B)
| a standard approach, and Fisher appears to be a spontaneous investor. |
| C)
| a standard approach, and Fisher appears to be an anchoring investor. |
|
Such a questionnaire is widely used for just his purpose. Given that Fisher wants to learn about each investment before she invests indicates she is methodical. (Study Session 4, LOS 10.f)
Fisher’s desire to create her portfolio one asset at a time is: A)
| not unusual and is indicative of the role of investor psychology in investment choices. |
| B)
| very unusual, but it is an acceptable method to create a portfolio for an individual investor, and Litner should follow Fisher‘s preferences. |
| C)
| very unusual, and indicates that Litner should not take Fisher on as a client. |
|
Fisher’s desire to compose a portfolio one position at a time is fairly typical of unsophisticated investors. Litner should try to convince Fisher of the benefits of taking a portfolio approach. (Study Session 4, LOS 10.d)
Fisher’s fear of the costs associated with rebalancing and turnover are: A)
| justified for rebalancing but not for turnover. |
| B)
| not justified for rebalancing but are justified for turnover. |
| C)
| justified for both rebalancing and turnover. |
|
Rebalancing and turnover can both increase transactions costs and can have unfavorable tax consequences. (Study Session 4, LOS 11.f)
Litner’s attempt to gather information for the IPS through a series of conversations, as described, is: A)
| one of many appropriate ways for gathering information. |
| B)
| recommended because it allows Litner to assess the accuracy of the information for consistency. |
| C)
| not recommended and deemed inappropriate. |
|
It is not appropriate because planning return expectations should take place concurrently with risk tolerance discussions. (Study Session 4, LOS 10.h) |
|