Chuckrox

Thanks so much crazyman and an-alyst for your guidance! I hope this way of studying works for me too as I really want to clear my concepts

laurab

I think you better revise the last study session of Quants from level 1 notes, and then move on to level 2 stuff. I had some problems in hypothesis testing but there is really no big deal in level 2 quants, its all too easy and the weightage is also minimal in exam. Just go on reading whatever is in notes and you will find answers to your questions by yourself. Thats how I did, and still doing. I tested my score with Qbank and it was pretty good.
No need to go through bulky curriculum books, unless a concept is struck in your mind.

prav_Cfa7

I’ve been having trouble with quants too but it’s fair to say I haven’t put in a good block of hours into it yet. Thanks guys for the advice. Good luck with the results Ayesha.

tango_gs

Quant really isn’t so bad. You can get done withit relatively quickly too.. just three readings.

rkapoor

BrightStar wrote:
Quant really isn’t so bad. You can get done withit relatively quickly too.. just three readings.
I would have to agree.. Quant for level 2 is pretty much your typical university Econometrics.

draz

here is my input, first 2 sessions of quant aren’t bad. simple regression and muliple regression. once it gets to time series, it’s rediculous. and the most quesitons on quant is coming from multiple regression. so if you nail it, and just pick up 1 or 2 questions on time series, you can still get over 70 percent on quant. i do have a question on coveriance stationary problem in schweiser Qbank(Question ID#: 86427), if anyone is scheiser student, please help me take a look. I’m confused with question B, there’s no levels of significance given in this problem, how am i supposed to test if b1=1 is significant:?

MythosHF

xuebaoht01 wrote:
here is my input, first 2 sessions of quant aren’t bad. simple regression and muliple regression. once it gets to time series, it’s rediculous. and the most quesitons on quant is coming from multiple regression. so if you nail it, and just pick up 1 or 2 questions on time series, you can still get over 70 percent on quant.
Anybody here an expert in the ethics section? Would be interesting to know if this is already a violation?
;-)